Abstract: The purpose of the article is to analyze the mechanism of memory policy in the context of the phenomenon of "collective memory" by M. Halbwaks. The policy of memory is an orderly action of political elites to form the desired set of images and representations of the past by society. Such a strategy makes it possible to solve several problems, in particular the problem of legitimacy, as well as the problem of argumentation of domestic and foreign policy programs chosen by the state, which may also set themselves the task of distorting their own historical past and worsening relations between the two states. The processing of collective memory as a component of social consciousness has undergone a serious evolution and today can represent a lot of aggressive strategies. The scientific novelty of the research is the use of a combined approach to understanding the phenomenon of collective memory and its processing. A combined approach based on the works of M. Halbwaks in the field of sociology and psychoanalysis based on the psychology of the unconscious Z. Freud, as well as the theory of the collective unconscious and its archetypes by C.G. Jung, allows us to identify the interdependence between the differentiation of images of the historical past and the levels of consciousness of the individual. A scheme of interconnection, as well as a scheme of sampling narratives of public consciousness in order to form a universal set of images and representations, has been developed. The conclusions confirm the validity of M. Halbwax's method and its correlation with psychoanalysis, and also indicate the danger of connivance on the part of the Russian state in relation to the aggressive policy of memory in the countries of the post-Soviet space and the former socialist bloc.

Keywords: collective memory, social consciousness, politics of memory, psychoanalysis, collective unconscious, social frame, frustration, nation-building, indicator, image

References:
Khal'bvaks M. Sotsial'nye ramki pamyati. M., 2007. S.11.
Khal'bvaks M. Kollektivnaya i istoricheskaya pamyat' // Neprikosnovennyy zapas 2019. 2-3(40-41).
Freyd Z. Nekotorye zamechaniya otnositel'no ponyatiya bessoznatel'nogo v psikhoanalize (1912). S.34-39.
Freyd Z. Psikhologiya bessoznatel'nogo. M., 2006. S. 25-38.
Safronova Yu.A. Memory stidues: evolyutsiya, problematika i institutsional'noe razvitie / Metodologicheskie voprosy izucheniya politiki pamyati: Sb. nauchn. tr. / Otv. red. Miller A. I., Efremenko D. V. — M.-SPb: Nestor-Istoriya, 2018. — 224 s.
Potseluev S. P. «Simvolicheskaya politika»: K istorii kontsepta // Simvolicheskaya politika. Vyp. 1: Konstruirovanie predstavleniy o proshlom kak vlastnyy resurs. M.: INION RAN, 2012. S. 17–53.
Prokudenkova O. V. Rossiya: Evropa ili Aziya polemika P. N. Milyukova s evraziytsami o roli geograficheskogo faktora v razvitii russkoy kul'tury // Vestnik RKhGA. 2006. ¹1.
Malinova O. Yu. Konstruirovanie smyslov: Issledovanie simvolicheskoy politiki v sovremennoy Rossii. M.: INION

Abstract: International relations are more and more often becoming the field of political conflicts. Despite the fact that the epoch of global confrontation has come to an end, the total number of political conflicts in the world is not only on the decline, but rather continues to be on the rise, and are manifested in new forms, with a low likelihood of responding to stabilizing impacts of traditional instruments of political management. Modern day conflicts have become one of the leading factors of instability in the world today. Because they are poorly managed, they have the tendency to escalate and to draw in a greater and greater number of participants, which creates a threat not only to those who are directly involved in the conflict, but to everyone else as well.

Keywords: the international relations, the international safety, political conflicts, conflicts management technologies, conflicts management models, psychological operations, information war, political, interests, the UN

References:
Manoylo A.V. Models of Information and Psychological Operations Used in International Conflicts // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-3.-C. 18-39. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_9091.html
Bazhanov E.P. China: From the Middle Kingdom to a Superpower in the 21st Century. Moscow 2007. p. 340.
China: Traditions and Modernity. Collection of Articles. Moscow 1976. p. 129.
Titarenko M.A. Russian and East Asia: Issues of International and Intercivilizations Relations. Moscow 1994. p. 24.
Keohane,R., Wye D. Power and Interdependence. World Politics in Transition. NY 2000.
Lebedeva M.M. World Politics. Moscow 2003. pp. 30-31.
Toinby A. J. Civilization Before the Court of History: A Compendium. Moscow 1995
Lebedeva M.M. Political Conflict Management: Approaches, Solutions, Technologies. Moscow: Aspect Press, 1999.
Nezavisimaya Gazeta, December 7, 2007.
Sedykh N. S. Sovremennyy terrorizm s tochki zreniya informatsionno-psikhologicheskikh ugroz//Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene, ¹2-2012