Abstract: The subject of the research is the problems of analysis and monitoring of a new economic phenomenon - the global space economy. Russian economics and official documents do not use the concept of "space economy." However, internationally, it has become firmly established in public discourse; the space economy is the object of systematic observations, cross-country comparisons, and evaluation. The paper shows that the evolution of the space economy and the growth of its influence on "earthly life" are ahead of scientific understanding. But attention to this object is necessary because, according to various signs, we can state the beginning of the "space transformation" of the world economy.The paper develops theoretical ideas about the phenomenon of the space economy and analyses the difficulties associated with monitoring this phenomenon. The author concludes that the vision of a space economy transformative role is increasingly spreading in the international context. However, as with digital transformation, the scientific understanding of this process is still lagging behind the rapidly changing realities.

Keywords: OECD, Space Technology, Space Business, Space Activity, Innovation, Change management, Space Economy, Monitoring, Space Industry, Space Law

References:
Barbaroux P. The metamorphosis of the world space economy: investigating global trends and national differences among major space nations’ market structure // Journal of Innovation Economics & Management. 2016. Vol. 20. No 2. P. 9-35.
OECD Handbook on Measuring the Space Economy. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2012.
Asimov I. Our Future in the Cosmos-Space // The Impact of Science on Society / Burke J., Bergman J., Asimov I. Washington: NASA, 1985.
Griffin M.D. The Space Economy. NASA 50th Anniversary Lecture Series. 17 September 2007.
Capital Flows as Space Opens for Business. Morgan Stanley. July 19, 2019.
Foust J. A trillion-dollar space industry will require new markets // SpaceNews. July 5, 2018.
Spinoff 2019. Technology Transfer Program. NASA, 2019.
Ricard W., Grandadam D., Prado-Saldanha F., Cohendet P., Stojak L. A New Perspective on Innovation in Space and Its Implications on the Tools and Measures Used to Assess the Indirect Impacts of Public Investment in the Space Sector // New Space

Abstract: The article is dealing with the identification and analysis of various variants of binary division (dichotomy) of the international space activity that is considered as a set of implemented projects or market sales. The key aspects of the modern development of space activities influence not only the technological, but mainly the institutional, organizational and economic features of interaction between participants in space activities and the effectiveness measurement. Such binary divisions of space activities as "applied vs.non-applied", "commercial vs.non-profit", "public vs.private", "budget vs.non-budget " are considered. In addition, an important aspect of the separation of the results of space activities into products/services and projects is considered. Further directions of research in this area are shown, including the development of model indicators and criteria for the effectiveness of space activities in their various forms and types.

Keywords: effectiveness, space services, space projects, value chain, public private partnership, public good, global space market, space activities, space research, space applications

References:
Payson D.B., Bendikov M.A. «Novyy kosmos»: k probleme identifikatsii osobennostey sovremennogo perioda razvitiya mezhdunarodnoy kosmicheskoy deyatel'nosti. V knige: Strategicheskoe planirovanie i razvitie predpriyatiy. Materialy KhKh Vserossiyskogo simpoziuma. Pod redaktsiey G.B. Kleynera. 2019. S. 578-580. URL: https://sympozium-cemi.ru/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/simpozium-hh.pdf
Payson D.B. Osobennosti primeneniya kategorii obshchestvennogo blaga k analizu rezul'tativnosti i institutsional'nogo oformleniya kosmicheskoy deyatel'nosti / Payson D.B. // Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya ekonomika. — 2018. ¹ 4. S. 1-20. URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=27646 (data obrashcheniya 12.10.2019).
Satellite Value Chain: Snapshot 2017 / Paris, Euroconsult, 2017-42 pp.
Prasad N., Rajagopalan R. Space India 2.0-Commerce, Policy, Security and Governance Perspectives // New Dehli, ORF, 2017.-389 p. URL: https://www.orfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/ORF_Space-India-2.0.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 12.10.2019).
Payson D.B

Abstract: The subject of the study is the history of the global market for placing satellites into geostationary orbit from the 1990s to the present. The author analyses various reasons (economic, technological, political, etc.), which helped the Russian Federation take a leading position in this market at the end of the XX centuries and lose them now. Special attention is paid to the American policy of sanctions and prohibitions used as a tool for regulating the global space market. Also, the actions of the rocket and space industry of China in the conditions of sanctions by the United States are considered. The paper provides the forecast of possible acts of Russia in a similar situation. For the first time, the paper presents the milestones in the economic history of the Russian launch vehicles in the global space market. The study of this topic allowed us to analyze the origins of Russia's successes and problems in the international market of launch services, as well as to assess the prospective availability of this market segment for Russian players.

Keywords: Khrunichev Center, Space Shuttle, Launch Vehicle, Launch Services, Space Economy, Global Space Market, Space History, Russia, USA, China

References:
Lisov I. Apstar-9. Sdelano v Kitae // Novosti Kosmonavtiki. 2015. ¹ 12. S. 33-34.
Proekt dlinnoyu chetvert' veka // Sibirskiy sputnik. 2018. ¹ 4. URL: https://www.iss-reshetnev.ru/media/newspaper/newspaper-2018/newspaper-445.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 15.10.2019).
Classification of geosynchronous objects/ ESA’s Space Debris Office, 2018. Issue 20. URL: http://www.astronomer.ru/data/0128/Classification_of_Geosynchronous_Objects_I20R0.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 15.10.2019).
Payson D.B. Fenomen kompanii SpaceX kak vyzov mezhdunarodnomu kosmicheskomu rynku // Issledovaniya kosmosa. 2016. ¹ 1. S. 36-50. URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=20451 (data obrashcheniya: 15.10.2019).
Granovskiy Yu. Anatoliy Kiselev: My uydem na nedosyagaemuyu orbitu. Interv'yu // Vedomosti, 20 dekabrya 2000 g. URL: https://www.vedomosti.ru/newspaper/articles/2000/12/20/intervyu-anatolij-kiselev-generalnyj-direktor-gknpc-im-hrunicheva-my-ujdem-na-nedosyagaemuyu-orbitu (data obrashcheniya: 15.10.2019).
Zinger K. J. An Overreaction tha

Abstract: The international space market and associated value chain are considered. We consider the generally accepted approaches promoted by the Satellite Industry Association to analyzing the structure and quantitative parameters of the space products and services market based on the gross turnover approach as well as government funding specifics. The approach suggested by G.Graziola of Bergamo University is analyzed that is based on the space industry/space economy dichotomy. The market structure is interpreted based in the Russia national standardization and experience. The prerequisites for the formation of a substantially different market structure are considered, based on the idea of the added values calculation along the value chain.

Keywords: downstream, upstream, gross turnover, added value, value chain, space economy, space services, space industry, international space market, public good

References:
Yanik A.A. K kontseptsii «kosmicheskoy ekonomiki» /Yanik A.A. // Trendy i upravlenie. — 2018.-¹ 1.-S.51-66.
Graziola G. The Italian space industry in 2010-2012. Structure, performance and returns from a high tech sector / Graziola G., Cristini A., Sciortino G. // L’industria. – 2016-¹1. – pp.11-50.
Graziola G. The Space Economy and Its Statistics: What Do They Tell Us? /Graziola G.//New Space. – 2018 – Vol.6.-¹.4 – pp. 269-286.
Frolov I.E. Razvitie mirovykh vysokotekhnologichnykh proizvodstv i kosmicheskie rynki: smozhet li kosmonavtika stat' novym global'nym novovvedeniem? /Frolov I.E. // Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii.-¹ 4 (79). – 2017. S. 43-57.
The Case for Space 2015. The impact of space on the UK economy//L., London Economics, 2015 – 140 pp. URL: http://www.ukspace.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/LE-Case-for-Space-2015-Full-Report.pdf (data obrashcheniya 24.12.2018).
Payson D.B. Biznes-modeli i peredel'naya struktura sovremennykh kosmicheskikh uslug / Payson D.B. //Tekhnologii i sredstva svyazi. Spetsia

Abstract: The current state and prospects for the development of new markets for space-based products and services related to material production outside the Earth's atmosphere are considered. The analysis of the main factors that led to the growth of interest in the "material" space markets after the period of development of their information segments was carried out. A brief overview of the current state of affairs with venture financing of projects in the field of extraterrestrial resource extraction and utilization, orbital services and space production is provided. The need to address the regulatory legal issues of the use of extraterrestrial resources in the context of the international status of the “common heritage of mankind” is emphasized. The conclusion is made about the ecosystem nature of the extraterrestrial resources’ utilization projects. The methods of segmental analysis of integrated markets for goods and services are implemented taking into account the economic and legal factors causing their future development.

Keywords: Additive technologies, Space manufacturing, Orbital servicing, Space resources’ utilization, New space markets, Space exploration, Space activities, Space debris, Common heritage, Venture investment

References:
Payson D.B. Kosmicheskaya deyatel'nost': Evolyutsiya, organizatsiya, instituty. M. : Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2010. – 312 s.
Payson D.B. Osobennosti primeneniya kategorii obshchestvennogo blaga k analizu rezul'tativnosti i institutsional'nogo oformleniya kosmicheskoy deyatel'nosti // Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya ekonomika. 2018. ¹ 4. S. 1-20.
Krishna A., Skenjana M.C., Do V.H., Yoshida R., Wang Q., Rizzo F. In-Orbit maintenance: the future of the satellite. Toulouse, 2016. – 78 pp. URL: http://chaire-sirius.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Krishna-et-al.-2016-In-Orbit-maintenance-the-future-of-the-satellite-industry-Unknown.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 25.12.2018).
On-orbit Satellite Servicing Study. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, 2010. – 190 pp. URL: https://sspd.gsfc.nasa.gov/images/nasa_satellite%20servicing_project_report_0511.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 25.12.2018).
Wilford J.N. Nasa Plans To Use Shuttle To Retrieve a Satellite // New York Times. August 17, 1984. URL: https://www.nytimes.com/1984/08/17/us/nasa-pl

Abstract:

Keywords: Turtsiya, Turetskoe kosmicheskoe agentstvo, Kosmicheskie Issledovaniya, Kosmicheskie sistemy, Sputniki, Voennyi kosmos, Kosmicheskaya politika, Issledovaniya i razrabotki

References:
Aslan, A. R. (2014). Where Are We in Space Discovery? (UzayKesfininNeresindeyiz?) Al Jazeera. http://www.aljazeera.com.tr/gorus/uzay-kesfinin-neresindeyiz
Davenport, C. (2015). A New Space Race Emerges as NASA Prepares to Award Contract to Ferry Supplies to Space Station, the Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2015/03/09/a-new-space-race-emerges-as-nasa-prepares-to-award-contract-to-ferry-supplies-to-space-station/
Department of Defense (2004). National Security Space Acquisition Policy, “Guidance for DoD Space System Acquisition Process” Number 03-01. Washington, DC: US Department of Defense.
Eisenhower Institute (2004). Space Security 2003. Washington D.C.
FM 3-14 (2005). Space Support to Army Operations (pp. 1-2). Washington D.C.: U.S. Land Forces.
Erturan, A. F. (2014). The New Army of Turkey; Founding of Space Forces (Turkiye’ninYeni Ordusu “Uzay Kuvvetleri” Kuruluyor), Star Gazete. http://haber.star.com.tr/teknoloji/turkiyenin-yeni-ordusu-uzay-kuvvetle

Abstract: This work is devoted to studying the conditions for eficient development of the space infrastructure as a com-ponent the new space economy. The subject of the analysis is the place and role played by the manned orbital complexes, including the International Space Stations (ISS), in creation of technological innovations that can also be implemented in the “earth” economy. Special attention is given to the analysis of current approaches towards commercialization of the results of scientiic research conducted on the ISS, as well as assessment of prospects of transfer of modern foreign organizational and administrational solutions in this area to the Russian space industry. On the example of the space experiment “Organaut”, prepared for the interests of a private company, the author demonstrates the practical possibility of transfer of modern in-ternational technological solutions on expediting the tempos of expansion of the space infrastructure into Russian practice. A conclusion is made on the need to reduce the bureaucratic cycle of preparation of space experiments and reasonableness of implementation of special institution of development outside the perimeter GK “Roskosmos”.

Keywords: International Space Station, ISS, Space Economy, Space Activity, Commercialization, US Orbital Segment, Russian Orbital Segment, US National Laboratory, NASA, Kibo

References:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2005. Public Law ¹ 109-155. Dec. 30, 2005. URL: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-109publ155/pdf/PLAW-109publ155.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 01.12.2017).
Reference Model for the International Space Station U.S. National Laboratory. ProOrbis LLC, September 20, 2010. – 135 p.
Request for Proposals No. CASIS 2015-2. Earth Observation to Benefit Energy Technology. Issuance Date: October 14, 2014. URL: http://www.iss-casis.org/files/RFP_CASIS_2015-2_Earth_Observation_to_Benefit_Energy_Technology_v1-02.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 01.12.2017).
Cooperative Agreement NASA and Center for the Advancement of Science in Space, Inc. / Federal Contract ¹ NNH11CD70A. URL: https://govtribe.com/contract/award/nnh11cd70a (data obrashcheniya: 01.12.2017).
ISS Transition and Deep Space Gateway Concept / S. Scimemi. Committee on Biological and Physical Sciences in Space Irvine, CA. November 2017. URL: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/ssbsite/

Abstract: The research subject is the analysis of the specificity of NASA’s interrelation with small and medium businesses in the sphere of scientific research and development. The research is based on the results of NASA’s public-private partnership programs in the sphere of space activities, primarily the long-term Small Business Innovation Research Program (SBIR). Special attention is given to the methods used for the evaluation of the progress of commercialization of the results of small businesses’ R&D for the aerospace agency. To solve the research tasks, the author uses general scientific research methods – formal-logical, comparative, transition from concrete to abstract, analysis, synthesis and others. Based on the results of the regular effectiveness audit of the SBIR program, conducted by national academies of sciences of the USA, the author concludes that the development of NASA’s management systems, including the level of its adaptability, ability to transform, and transparency, is a necessary condition, but it is not enough for the improvement of the research intensity of the related economic sector. The author concludes that within NASA’s area of responsibility, including its key state partners, general contractors, the academic community and other participants of scientific and innovation activities, the models of evaluation of the level of commercialization in terms of common economic activities (for example, the volume of sales or gross proceeds) have limited applicability. The main criteria are the broadening of the total volume of technological knowledge in space and missile sector, and the potential commercial value of R&D results, even if they haven’t entered the market yet. Another criterion is the development level of the information infrastructure of the sector, which is also the key instrument of functioning of the modern system of space activities. 

Keywords: Research and Development, Innovation, Space Policy, Science Policy, Small Business, economics of space activities, Public-Private Partnership, Space Activity, Commercialization, NASA

References:
Small Business Innovation Development Act of 1982 // Public Law 97-219. July 22, 1982.
Small Business Research and Development Enhancement Act // Public Law 102-564. September, 30, 2000.
Small Business Reauthorization Act of 2000 // Public Law 106-554. September 30, 2008.
Small Business Administration, Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program Policy Directive. February 24, 2014. URL: https://www.sbir.gov/sites/default/files/sbir_pd_with_1-8-14_amendments_2-24-14.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 01.04.2017).
An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program - Project Methodology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2004. – 124 p.
An Assessment of the SBIR Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2008. – 402 p.
An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2007. – 366 p.
SBIR/STTR at the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2016. – 434 p.
An

Abstract: The research subject is the peculiarities of innovative development of the rocket and space industry in the Russian Federation. Based on the complex analysis of external and internal challenges and the institutional and legal context of this sector reforming, the authors detect the obstacles to quantitative changes in the development of one of the key sectors of Russia’s economics. The study shows that in the context of the new challenges, the improvement of adaptive capacities of the rocket and space industry of Russia and its capacity for internal changes and transparency is of a prime importance. To accomplish the research tasks, the authors apply the system, structural-functional, comparative-historical, comparative-legal, formal-logical and other research methods. The authors conclude that in terms of the peculiarities of the goals and tasks of the “Roscosmos” company, it is becoming a unique institution, according to its scale and complexity, working in the sphere of development of a specific sector of Russia’s economics, though its institutional status and the related functions haven’t been formally legalized in the federal legislation. The authors note that the successful modernization of the rocket and space industry determines the possibility for Russia to remain the leader in the field of space exploration.  

Keywords: Meso-economic analysis, Public-private partnership, Open innovation, Innovative development program, Development institution, Rocket and space industry, Roscosmos, Research and Development, Innovation cluster, Technology platform

References:
Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 2 dekabrya 2013 g. ¹ 874 «O sisteme upravleniya raketno-kosmicheskoy otrasl'yu» // SZ RF. 2013. ¹ 49 (Ch. VII). St. 6398.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 13 iyulya 2015 g. ¹ 215-FZ «O Gosudarstvennoy korporatsii po kosmicheskoy deyatel'nosti "Roskosmos"» // SZ RF. 2015. ¹ 29 (Ch. 1). St. 4341.
Federal'naya kosmicheskaya programma Rossii na 2016-2025 gody (utv. Postanovleniem Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 23 marta 2016 g. ¹ 230). URL: http://www.roscosmos.ru/print/22347/ (data obrashcheniya: 10.12.2016).
Protokol zasedaniya Mezhvedomstvennoy rabochey gruppy po realizatsii prioritetov innovatsionnogo razvitiya prezidiuma Soveta pri Prezidente Rossiyskoy Federatsii po modernizatsii ekonomiki i innovatsionnomu razvitiyu Rossii ot 13 maya 2016 g. Razdel II. URL: https://docviewer.yandex.ru/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rosim.ru%2FAttachment.aspx%3FId%3D61884&name=Attachment.aspx%3FId%3D61884&lang=ru&c=582c5cda75a3 (data obrashcheniya: 10.12.2016).
Vstupitel'noe slovo Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii na sov

Abstract: The research subject is the peculiarities of innovative development of the rocket and space industry in the Russian Federation. Based on the complex analysis of external and internal challenges and the institutional and legal context of this sector reforming, the authors detect the obstacles to quantitative changes in the development of one of the key sectors of Russia’s economics. The study shows that in the context of the new challenges, the improvement of adaptive capacities of the rocket and space industry of Russia and its capacity for internal changes and transparency is of a prime importance. To accomplish the research tasks, the authors apply the system, structural-functional, comparative-historical, comparative-legal, formal-logical and other research methods. The authors conclude that in terms of the peculiarities of the goals and tasks of the “Roscosmos” company, it is becoming a unique institution, according to its scale and complexity, working in the sphere of development of a specific sector of Russia’s economics, though its institutional status and the related functions haven’t been formally legalized in the federal legislation. The authors note that the successful modernization of the rocket and space industry determines the possibility for Russia to remain the leader in the field of space exploration.  

Keywords: Meso-economic analysis, Public-private partnership, Open innovation, Innovative development program, Development institution, Rocket and space industry, Roscosmos, Research and Development, Innovation cluster, Technology platform

References:
Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 2 dekabrya 2013 g. ¹ 874 «O sisteme upravleniya raketno-kosmicheskoy otrasl'yu» // SZ RF. 2013. ¹ 49 (Ch. VII). St. 6398.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 13 iyulya 2015 g. ¹ 215-FZ «O Gosudarstvennoy korporatsii po kosmicheskoy deyatel'nosti "Roskosmos"» // SZ RF. 2015. ¹ 29 (Ch. 1). St. 4341.
Federal'naya kosmicheskaya programma Rossii na 2016-2025 gody (utv. Postanovleniem Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 23 marta 2016 g. ¹ 230). URL: http://www.roscosmos.ru/print/22347/ (data obrashcheniya: 10.12.2016).
Protokol zasedaniya Mezhvedomstvennoy rabochey gruppy po realizatsii prioritetov innovatsionnogo razvitiya prezidiuma Soveta pri Prezidente Rossiyskoy Federatsii po modernizatsii ekonomiki i innovatsionnomu razvitiyu Rossii ot 13 maya 2016 g. Razdel II. URL: https://docviewer.yandex.ru/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rosim.ru%2FAttachment.aspx%3FId%3D61884&name=Attachment.aspx%3FId%3D61884&lang=ru&c=582c5cda75a3 (data obrashcheniya: 10.12.2016).
Vstupitel'noe slovo

Abstract: This article is devoted to the research of the latest changes taking place on the international space market, as well as the new challenges emerging before its major players, including U. S. and Russia. The main attention is given to the analysis of the peculiarities of the strategy and work of one of the most unusual “players” in the modern space economy – a private American corporation SpaceX, which not only sort of challenged the current tradition in this area, but also actively influences the process of its institutional renovation. This work assesses the influence of the “SpaceX phenomenon” upon the institutional environment of the space economy on the national (United States) and global scale, upon trends of development of the global space activity, and national space “agenda”. Although the examined phenomenon is an endemic product of American system and the experience of SpaceX is unlikely to be transferred in an unchanged form into other national jurisdictions, the work of the corporation is objectively becoming the drive of development of the space market as a whole. The new U. S. model of relations between the state and the private sector in the space sphere is currently significantly ahead of any analogues of the Old World, and thus, this experience requires meticulous studying for the purpose of transferring valuable results.

Keywords: SpaceX, Elon Musk, Commercial Launches, NASA, USA, Space Policy, Space Market, Space Economics, Public-private partnership, Strategic Planning

References:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2010. Public Law 111-267, Oct. 11, 2010 // Page 124 Stat. 2805. URL: http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/649377main_PL_111-267.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 19.09.2016).
U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act of 2015. Public Law 114-90. Nov. 25, 2015. URL: https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/2262/text (data obrashcheniya 19.09.2016).
Payson D.B. Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnerstvo kak institut razvitiya v oblasti kosmicheskoy deyatel'nosti: zarubezhnyy opyt i rossiyskie plany // Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal'nogo upravleniya. 2009. ¹3 S.17-34.
Stucker M. A Preliminary Strategy for Inclusion of Innovative Access in NASA ESMD’s Spiral 1 Acquisitions / PowerPoint presentation, December 16, 2004. Commercial Crew & Cargo Program Office, Houston, TX. 2004. P.5. Tsit. po: Commercial Orbital Transportation Services: A New Era in Spaceflight. NASA, 2014. P. 12.
Commercial Orbital Transportation Services: A New Era in Spaceflight. NASA,