Reference:
Apartsev O.R..
Ultrabiotic Generalization
// Psychologist. – 2014. – № 1.
– P. 55-93.
DOI: 10.7256/2306-0425.2014.1.11796.
DOI: 10.7256/2306-0425.2014.1.11796
Read the article
Abstract: In offered work the area of studied populations is displaced in the direction "not the quite biotic" of populations. The choice of such direction is set in the assumption of possibility of generation by populations of biotics certain the populyatsiobraznykh of objects of not biotic nature, and also, search of explanations of phenomena the ekstravertnykh of manifestations of the advanced biotizm which is beyond ordinary model of biotic population, even at investment of biotics with alarm functions. The research methodology, as well as earlier, consists in consecutive application to any considered populations of the Theory of Ambivalent Generalization. It is necessary to refer nature definition to the key methodical moments кредов - intra population exchange particles, and also, clarification of features of interaction with resources and an other essential environment of population. Discussion of possible contact with populations of a "extraterrestrial" origin, within the Generalization Theory, showed that this approach doesn't create mechanisms of an ekstraordinarnost of a biotizm, reducing its results to standard heterotypical reactions. In further researches it was supposed that "not quite biotic" populations arise only as derivative objects of activity of biotics. Studying of some test populations suitable under definition "not quite biotic", showed existence of these objects in dual space of factors: surrounding space and consciousness - a certain internal attributive mechanism of advanced biotics. Research of test populations showed full compliance of dynamics of such populations of the Theory of Ambivalent Generalization. All "not biotic" objects were given the general name - "ultrabiotics", with a localization place - in "consciousness" of the developed biotics where they arise and exist as objects concepts. Actually, ultrabiotics prove as interface котрагент for development by biotics of surrounding meta-biotic space outside direct contact. Generalization of all space of interaction Ultrabiotikov with world around received the name "Biokosm" in which it is possible to allocate physical, social (population) and abstract subspaces on an object prevalence. For consciousnesses mechanism disclosure, the simplified model of individual "consciousness" of a separate biotic for which realization the model of neural population is used is offered, is more exact: populations the kommensalnykh of attributive logical objects – extract of logical functions of neurons. Conclusions about specific properties of development of logical attributives of neural populations, and about their submission of the Theory of Generalization that allows to declare "consciousness" as about Unikalization's process in population of neurons became result of such approach.In the described ultrabiotic model it is possible to investigate the reason of emergence of two philosophical dialectically irreconcilable doctrines: idealism and materialism.
The dual space of attributes of each ultrabiotic creates the conflict which essence is reduced to the competition of a choice of one of two reference systems: or connected with the interface function between a biotic and the world, or - with function of the internal logical analysis of a biotic. By complex of consecutive consideration of population objects it is shown that the Theory of Ambivalent Generalization is the uniform propeller of development of populations in the direction (The lifeless nature) → (Biotizm) → (Consciousness) → (Biokosm) that is, in fact, the mechanism of expansion of Biotizm in the Universe. The presented picture of Biokosm extending in the Universe in whom in each timepoint and in each point the Theory of Ambivalent Generalization which is the uniform law for all biotic processes is executed, allows to draw a conclusion on existence of the large-scale invariancy created by Generalization that is expressed in fractality of manifestation of Biotizm.
Keywords: ultrabiotics, biotics, ambivalent generalization, consciousness, unums, sense unums, materialism and idealism, biocosm, scale invariance, fractals
References:
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emerdzhentnost'.
Kirkpatrick, K., Bilton, T., Hansen, B. C., & Loschky, L. C. (2013, December 23). Scene Gist Categorization by Pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes.Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/xan0000014// http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/xan/sample.aspx.
Yakovlev V.A. Informatsionnoe edinstvo bytiya: soznanie, zhizn', materiya // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-10.-C. 1-57. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.10.8920. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_8920.html
Utochkin I. S. "Mertvye zony" vnimaniya // Eksperimental'naya psikhologiya. 2009. T. 2. № 2. S. 16-30.
Stauffer D. Introduction to percolation theory. London. 1985.124p.
Politekhnicheskiy slovar'. Gl.red. I.I. Artobolevskiy. M., «Sovetskaya entsiklopediya», 1977, /Upravlenie/, s. 521.
Bak P. How Nature works. The science of self-organized criticaliry. Oxford University Press. 1997.
Mandelbrot B.B. The fractal geometry of nature. San Francisco. Freeman,1982, 460p.
Reference:
Parkhomenko R.N..
Carl Schmitt's Theory of Political Romanticism
// Psychologist. – 2012. – № 1.
– P. 138-164.
DOI: 10.7256/2306-0425.2012.1.134.
DOI: 10.7256/2306-0425.2012.1.134
Read the article
Abstract: The article is devoted to the theory of political romanticism created by a famous German philosopher Carl Schmitt (1888-1985). Today Schmitt is famous in Russia as a theorist of state and follower of authoritarian methods in state policy. In his early works he studied the term 'romanticism' and gave his own evaluation of this phenomenon. Today Schmitt's ideas are very popular because he tried to define not only the psychological roots of the term 'romanticism', but also to discover research potentials and practical consequences arising out of that term and playing an important role in social life and politics. The author shows that romantic world perception had a profound influence on spiritual development of Germany and was widely used for creation and theoretical justification of the totalitarian regime in that country. In our turn, we can see that romanticism was typical for Russian politics, too, which resulted in creation of a totalitarian regime in Russia last century.
Keywords: romanticism, politics, Western Europe, conservative ideas, revolutionary ideas, Germany, traditional society, romantic art, French revolution, individuality
References:
Shmitt, K. 2006: Leviafan v uchenii o gosudarstve Tomasa Gobbsa. Smysl i fiasko odnogo politicheskogo simvola. SPb. 300 s.
Shmitt, K. 1992: Ponyatie politicheskogo // Voprosy sotsiologii. M. 1992, № 1. S. 37-67.
Shmitt, K. 2000: Politicheskaya teologiya. M. 336 s.
Shmitt, K. 2005: Diktatura: ot istokov sovremennoy idei suvereniteta do proletarskoy klassovoy bor'by. SPb. 326 s.
Rakhshmir, P. Idei i lyudi. Politicheskaya mysl' pervoy poloviny XX veka. Perm'. 2002. 368 s.
Filippov, A. 2000: Karl Shmitt. Rastsvet i katastrofa // Shmitt 2000.
Filippov, A 2005: Tekhnika diktatury: k logike politicheskoy sotsiologii // Shmitt 2005.
Cassirer, E. 1994: Der Mythus des Staates. Philosophische Grundlagen politischen Verhaltens, Frankfurt a. M.
Cortés, D. 1838: El clasicismo y el romanticismo, Obras II. Correo Nacional.
Parkhomenko, R. 2007: Cassirers politische Philosophie: Zwischen allgemeiner Kulturtheorie und Totalitarismus-Debatte. Karlsruhe. 285 S.
Schmitt, C. 1919: Politische Romantik. (Berlin 1998).