Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Man and Culture
Reference:

Personalistic overtones in the realization of Enlightenment ideas (based on the history of the Illuminati Order)

Rozin Vadim Markovich

Doctor of Philosophy

Chief Scientific Associate, Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences 

109240, Russia, Moskovskaya oblast', g. Moscow, ul. Goncharnaya, 12 str.1, kab. 310

rozinvm@gmail.com
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8744.2024.2.69811

EDN:

POUOKN

Received:

10-02-2024


Published:

29-03-2024


Abstract: The article considers one of the lines of understanding and realization of Enlightenment ideas, due to the peculiarities of the New European personality. A personality is an individual acting independently and therefore forced to build a world and private self-image that partially does not coincide with the generally accepted ones. Kant associates these features precisely with Enlightenment, with the competence to use one's mind without guidance from someone else. Two social institutions are considered, the young nation-state and the Catholic Church, striving to put the individual, Society and communities under their control and management. The author suggests that society and communities were created in response to the pressure and expansion of these social institutions. The similarities and differences of social institutions and communities represented by unions and orders are analyzed. The relations between these three subjects and social forces (institutions of church and state, Society and communities) were quite tense, there was a struggle between them, the result of which, on the one hand, was the demarcation and separation of zones of influence, on the other hand, the suppression of the enemy, which often turned out to be Society, communities and the individual. In this context, according to the author, a conspiracy discourse is emerging, which the closer to our time, the more it is used against communities and individuals. This struggle within the institutions of the state and the church, as well as in art, is illustrated by the example of the history of the Illuminati. The activities of the Illuminati and other Orders (communities) were directed by a New European personality who, as Kant wrote, aspired to adulthood, which was in contradiction with the desire of the state and the Catholic Church to direct and control the mind and actions of a person. The author believes that the confrontation of the individual, Society and communities with the state and its institutions persists in our time. Of course, we are talking about a certain type of personality, so to speak, Kantian, and not any; there are individuals and communities that support the state.


Keywords:

the individual, personality, Institute, Society, communities, The Order, culture, control, freedom, state

This article is automatically translated.

 

Introduction

 

Immanuel Kant, describing the Enlightenment, wrote the following. "ENLIGHTENMENT is a person's way out of the state of underage, in which he is through his own fault. Underage is the inability to use your mind without guidance from someone else.<…>Enlightenment requires only freedom... <...> the public use of one's own mind should always be free and only it can give enlightenment to people. But the private use of reason must often be very limited, but in such a way that it does not particularly hinder the development of enlightenment. <...> No epoch can commit itself and swear to put the next epoch in a position where it would be impossible for it to expand its (primarily urgently needed) knowledge, get rid of mistakes and generally move forward in enlightenment. This would be a crime against human nature, the original purpose of which is precisely this movement forward." [4, pp. 29, 31, 33].

As we can see, Kant focuses on personality and the development of reason and society, while he understands personality in two ways: on the one hand, it is "freedom over natural necessity", on the other ? voluntary adherence to duty, morality and reason, which were backed by law and the national state. "This," Kant writes, "is nothing but personality, that is, freedom and independence from the mechanism of all nature, considered at the same time as the ability of a being who is subject to special, namely, given by his own mind, pure practical laws…The moral law is sacred (inviolable). Man, however, is not so holy, but humanity in his person should be sacred to him" [5, pp. 509, 511].

Speaking about the enlightenment, Kant is referring to the pan-European process of the formation of modernity, first of all, reforms in education, the constitution of national states, the formation of law and culture, but believes that the leading role is played by the individual, despite his natural selfish desires. "Kantian ethics,? explains Piama Gaidenko, ?set strict requirements for the individual: he had to enter into a difficult struggle with his inclinations…For Kant, freedom was defined as the opposite of the natural principle, measured by the measure of resistance to nature" [3, pp. 95-96, 99].

 

The main part

 

While agreeing with Kant, who points to the role of the individual, it is necessary, nevertheless, to pay attention to the fact that during this period the individual was opposed by two institutions ? the weakening, but still powerful Catholic Church and the rapidly developing, gaining strength national state. The latter moves from the role of a tax collector, protection from external enemies, and maintenance of internal order to universal control and management, including for individuals. "Summing up," writes Martin Kreveld, "it should be noted that the period under consideration is characterized by the creation of an apparatus that allowed the state to do without intermediaries and exert unprecedented pressure on its citizens. "The transformation of the state from an instrument into an ideal," Creveld writes, "would never have happened if it had not strengthened control over society, far surpassing everything that its predecessors had only tried to do in the early Modern period… Every European, and subsequently any other, state after 1789 wanted to be sure that the daily activities of the population were under its control and, as far as possible, served the purposes of this very state. The most important means of achieving this were the police and the prison apparatus, the education and social security systems" [7, pp. 124, 165-166].

Individuals and personalities, as subjects incommensurable in strength with the church and the state, begin to organize themselves in order to control these institutions, on the one hand, into Society, on the other ? into local communities (parties, unions, orders). If Society represents the citizens of the nation?state as a whole, then communities are separate groups of citizens, including individuals. The relations between these three subjects and social forces (institutions of church and state, Society and communities) were far from blissful, there was a struggle between them, the result of which, on the one hand, was the demarcation and separation of zones of influence, on the other ? the suppression of the enemy, which often turned out to be communities and individuals. At the same time, a variety of means were used ? power, laws, philosophy and science, art, etc. It is in this context that the conspiracy discourse develops, whose followers accused the Illuminati of plotting against religion and the state, discourse as a tool using both rational arguments, for example, scientific and artistic. To better understand the complex transformation of sociality and personality indicated here, consider one example ? the formation and evolution of the movement and the Order of the Illuminati.     

They arose precisely in the wake of the implementation of the Enlightenment project, which is clearly seen in the goals of the first union and the first Order of the Illuminati ("Union of those Striving for Perfection", Bund der Perfektibilisten; "Order of the Illuminati", Illuminatenorden). Its ideologist, Adam Weishaupt, a lecturer at the university Department of Canon Law, put forward the main goal of the union as "the fight against clericalism in the German education system, especially the influence of the Jesuits on it. “My goal is to demonstrate the advantage of reason," Weishaupt wrote in his policy statement in May 1776. It was planned that his society would 'gradually pin down the enemies of reason and humanity', which is necessary to 'improve our economic, political, philosophical and religious system'" [8, p. 122].

"The teaching of the order, based on the idea of universal enlightenment and through it the spiritual salvation of mankind, bore the imprint of the worldview of Weishaupt himself, who was influenced by ... the preachers of rationalism. Weishaupt taught that human nature is inherently good and inclined to goodness, but external conditions, primarily oppression by tyrants and lack of access to education, make it evil…The primary task of the ruler is enlightenment; with universal enlightenment of people, all states will come to harmonious peaceful coexistence and thereby bring the salvation of mankind closer in a religious sense" [8, pp. 124-125].

These provisions are worth commenting on. As we can see, the conversation is not only about education and science (enlightenment), but in general about the formation of European culture (economy, state, values of the new social order, etc.). And what is meant by saving humanity? It is clearly not a medieval understanding of the second coming of Christ and the task of turning an old man into a new one, living in accordance with the Holy Scriptures. Rather, salvation is understood as the construction of a new world based on the ideas of reason and freedom, guaranteeing the European personality well-being and power, provided that he masters nature and his passions. As Francis Bacon wrote: "Let the human race only seize its right to nature, which has been assigned to it by divine grace, and let it be given power" <...> but before it can approach the more remote and intimate in nature, it is necessary to introduce a better and more perfect use of the human spirit and mind<...> the way to this was opened to us by no other means than the just and legitimate belittling of the human spirit" [1, pp. 192-193; 2, 68-69].    

The next question that arises when reading the Weishaupt manifesto is, what is an order, how does it differ from a social institution such as a church or a state? On the one hand, the order, as well as the social institution, is focused on solving certain problems in well-defined ways, fixed through the organization of the Order and the rules (charter) [9, pp. 101-109]. For example, the structure of the Illuminati Order "consisted of primary cells-lodges united into prefectures under the control of the general order council, modeled on the chivalric German Masonic statutes, primarily Strict obedience <...> members of the order were taught both the spiritual teachings of the founder and the basics of social sciences: philosophy, social studies, history and law <...> [8, pp. 124, 125]. The activities of another Illuminati Order, the New Israel, were joint prayer, ecstatic religious practices of purification and repentance, meditation ("silent prayer"), alchemical experiments, the practice of theurgy and prophetic sessions, when questions were asked to "Heaven" and answers were received, in turn interpreted according to biblical texts using a special digital code" [8, p. 128].    

On the other hand, if a social institution was open to any social individual on the territory of a national state and was closely connected with other social institutions [9, pp. 109-116], then the Order served only members of a certain community and was in difficult relations with social institutions. For example, the Templar Order was created for such a community, which included knights monks who were striving with all their soul for salvation, but at the same time did not let go of their sword. "The mission of the Templar Order was formulated by St. Bernard as a double ministry: fighting the devil in heaven and his minions on earth, protecting Christ and helping all those who walk the path of salvation. A knight monk is a warrior of Christ in heaven and on earth, beloved of the Mother of God" [9, p. 119]. Successfully competing with the royal power and the church, the Templars aroused the envy and anger of the latter, which, in the end, resulted in the persecution and defeat of the Order. "The destruction of the Templars in 1312 by Philip IV," writes L. Karsavin, "was an act of brute force caused by the centralized aspirations and financial desires of the royal power" [6, p. 119]

There is nothing surprising here: since the Orders focused on individual communities and a certain type of personality, they often sought either to get out of control of the state and its institutions or to direct their activities in a direction desirable for the Order, a direction that usually did not coincide with the goals and mission of the state, which, in Creveld's words, sought to control everyone and everything is on their territory. One of the tools of the state (and the church) in the fight against independent Orders were conspiracy discourses and art. A striking example is the fight against the Illuminati.

"Due to the widespread coverage of the Illuminati Order in the European press and the scandals associated with it, by the end of the XVIII century. a number of conspiracy theories about the activities of the Illuminati were formed <...> the Illuminati, ? writes J. de Mestre, who influenced M.M. Speransky, who was accused, among other things, of "illuminating", is called those malicious persons who nowadays dared to conceive and even form a criminal society in Germany with the terrible goal of exterminating Christianity and legitimate power in Europe. [pp. 130, 131 And here is an example of the reminiscences of this struggle against the Illuminati already in our time in art. "In this regard, it should be noted the fantastic-satirical trilogy by Robert Shea and R.A. Wilson "Illuminatus!" (1975-1984) and several of its sequels, in which their authors created them as an anthology of world conspiracy theories…The book contains many excerpts from sources from different years telling about the "Illuminati conspiracy", as well as a number of their own inventions" [8, p. 136].    

 

Conclusion

 

Of course, the artists, I think unconsciously, not only worked for the state and the church, they were attracted by the wide possibilities of a conspiracy plot, as well as the mystery and esoteric nature of the Illuminati's activities [10]. However, from the point of view of the latter, it was just a style and protection, allowing, on the one hand, to preserve their freedom, on the other ? to hide from the pervasive control of the state, on the third hand, a condition for passage into the reality of a proper life and salvation. The activities of the Illuminati and other Orders (communities) were directed by a New European personality who, as Kant wrote, aspired to adulthood, the desire to "use his mind without guidance from someone else," which was in contradiction with the desire of the state and the Catholic Church to direct and control the mind and actions of a person. This dilemma and contradiction persist and have not been resolved to this day, although they exist and operate in other social and cultural conditions and forms. 

References
1. Bacon, F. (1935). New organon. L.: OGI3-sotsekgiz.
2. Bacon, F. (1971). The Great Restoration of the Sciences // Bacon F. Works in two volumes. T. 1. Moscow: Mysl.
3. Gaidenko, P. (1997). Breakthrough to the transcendental. New ontology of the twentieth century. M.: Republic.
4. Kant, Immanuel. (1994). Collected works in 8 vols. Ò. 8. M.: Choro.
5. Kant, I. (1997). Critique of practical reason. Op. in 4 volumes. T. 3. – Moscow: Moscow Philosophical Foundation.
6. Karsavin, L.P. (1992). Monasticism in the Middle Ages. Moscow: Higher. school.
7. Kreveld, M. (2006). The Rise and Decline of the State. Moscow: IRISEN.
8. Kuzmishin, E.L. (2023). Transmutation of the image of the Illuminati: from the margins to the center. Esotericism in philosophy, literature and art. Moscow: Publishing house. GITIS.
9. Rozin, V.M. (2014). Formation and features of social institutions: Cultural-historical and methodological analysis. Moscow: URSS.
10. Rozin, V.M. (2016). Plausible conspiracy theories (discourse analysis). Politics and Society, 3.

Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the study, as the author figuratively presented in the title of an article for the journal Culture and Art ("Personalistic overtones in the realization of Enlightenment ideas (based on the material of the history of the Illuminati Order)"), is the personocentrism of Enlightenment ideas, considered in the object — in the totality of the goals of the Illuminati Order declared at the time. Following the logic of minimizing the text of the narrative, the author reduces the methodological support of the article as much as possible, presenting to the reader exclusively his own final considerations: the results of a meaningful analysis of the primary sources of Enlightenment ideas (F. Bacon, I. Kant) and a generalization of the research of the Illuminati Order in the context of the formation of European science, carried out by colleagues (P. P. Gaidenko, L. P. Karsavin, E. L. Kuzmishin, V. M. Rozin). The author rightly notes that, in general, the concept of Enlightenment opposes the individual (as some form of individualized consciousness) and society (as an object of management) to social institutions of management: the church and the state. The basic idea of Enlightenment, that a person, as an enlightened and self—governing individual, becomes free, considered on the example of the declared goals of the Illuminati, is in conflict with Masonic religious and mystical practices of suppressing personal individuality and freedom in favor of the interests of the community. The author does not focus on this aspect of Freemasonry (sectarianism), since not all Illuminati practices are declared in writing. At the same time, the author's judgments about the reasons for a person's search for social ties outside the church and the state are quite appropriate: on the one hand, it is disappointment in the dominant institutions of government, on the other, fear of loneliness and the search for protection from the domination of church and state in non—traditional social ties. The author boldly classifies the Illuminati Order as an institution of civil society emerging in Europe in the XVI century (civil association in common interests beyond the influence of family, church and state), dividing society into communities, but does not focus the reader's attention on an essential aspect of any community: It can only resist the state and the church as institutions of government when it is organized into a system by a centralized governing body. And here we should pay attention to the lack of publicity and totalitarianism of government bodies in closed sects. If in the open (public) confrontation between the state and society, society and the individual, legal levers are formed to limit the total domination of the governing center, then communities are deprived of such levers, self-governing within the framework of the total charter on the basis of primitive initiation techniques of its adherents. Thus, despite the fact that the author's essay lacks a scientific and methodological apparatus, the subject of the study was considered by the author at a sufficient level for publication in a scientific journal. According to the reviewer, it is disclosed somewhat one-sidedly, but the author has the right to defend his own position, while retaining the same right for the reader. The research methodology is based on the comparative historical methodology of the history of ideas within the framework of the institutional approach. Despite the fact that the research program is not presented by the author, the logic of the author's thought is quite clear and revealed in the sequence of the arguments and quotations given. The author quite reasonably summarizes what exactly interested European artists in the Illuminati movement: in Europe of the XVI century, in his opinion, a new European romantic personality was emerging, striving to arrange sociality in his own manner, "which was in contradiction with the desire of the state and the Catholic Church to direct and control human reason and actions." The author rightly notes that "this dilemma and contradiction persist and have not been resolved to this day, although they exist and operate in other social and cultural conditions and forms." The author's conclusions are well-reasoned and trustworthy. The author does not explain the relevance of the topic to the reader, but it is quite obvious that the problematic of contradictions between man and society does not lose its relevance in modern social and cultural conditions. The scientific novelty, contained primarily in the original author's selection of sources and generalized literature, is beyond doubt. The author's final conclusions are well-reasoned, although some judgments in the general context of the narrative contain the subject of relevant theoretical criticism. The author's text style is scientific: the ratio of special and everyday vocabulary is well balanced. The structure of the article is subordinated to the logic of presenting the results of scientific research. The bibliography reveals the problematic field of research, although the relevant scientific literature over the past 3-5 years is poorly represented. Appealing to opponents is quite correct, logical and appropriate. The article is of interest to the readership of the magazine "Culture and Art" and can be recommended for publication.