Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Culture and Art
Reference:

Khrenov, N. A. Between the Linear Principle and the Cyclic Principle: Art History From the Point of View of Pitirim Sorokin’s Social Dynamics. Article 2.

Abstract: The article touches upon one of the most topical issues in the methodology of art history. The absolute priority given in the history research to the linear principle which genesis goes back to the age of Enlightenment has made art historians to pay more attention to certain periods while leaving other periods without adequate interpretations. In the latter case art is perceived as declining and not demonstrating complete or definite artwork as it seemed. This is the reason why those periods in art history were rarely studied. The example is the perception of the Western or Byzantine medieval art. As the science that was formed in the age of Enlightenment, esthetics took the exclusive Renaissance art as the starting point in the art development. Based on that approach, all artistic values were interpreted disregarding the type of culture they represented. In his first article the author described how Pitirim Sorokin destroyed stereotypes of the academic community and applied the cyclic principle to all historical periods as an alternative to the linear principle. In the second article the author shows how the absolute priority given to the linear principle in art history created an abundance of insoluble questions and how the cyclic principle applied by Pitirim Sorokin to art history help to solve these questions. The present article focuses on the constructability of the cyclic principle used by Pitirim Sorokin. It is also very important that Pitirim Sorokin talked not only about methodology but also about application of that methodology to all periods of art history. Pitirim Sorokin shows how the three types of culture have been constantly taking turns thought the history: sensate culture, ideational culture and integrated or synthesized culture. Development of each artistic style is shown within the framework of a particular cultural environment. Therefore, art history appears to be closely connected with cultural history. Thus, Pitirim Sorokin’s concept of social dynamics offers a very useful methodological approach to researchers. Despite the fact that Pitirim Sorokin introduced his ideas in the middle of the last century, nevertheless, his ideas were left unnoticed by both Russian and Western scientists and sociologists for quite a long time. It was partly due to the fact that social studies and history have always had quite uneasy elations. Sociologists very rarely referred to history but Pitirim Sorokin eliminated that prejudice. The intensive development of cultural research in modern Russian makes researchers be more interested in Pitirim Sorokin’s theory of social dynamics because his theory combined both the historical and cultural approaches. Pitirim Sorokin’s theory is one of the brightest examples of the interaction between different branches of modern science. The author of the present article very well shows how useful such inter-disciplinary interaction may be for art history researches.


Keywords:

Cultural dynamics, crisis of culture, linear principle, cyclic principle, longue duree, sensate culture, ideational culture, synthesized culture, medieval art, super-sensate reality.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Bazen Zh. Istoriya istorii iskusstva. Ot Vazari do nashikh dney. M., 1995;
2. Bel'ting Kh. Obraz i kul't. Istoriya obraza do epokhi iskusstva. M., 2002;
3. Berdyaev N. Filosofiya svobody. Smysl tvorchestva. M., 1989;
4. Brodel' F. Istoriya i obshchestvennye nauki. Istoricheskaya dlitel'nost' // Filosofiya i metodologiya istorii. M., 1977;
5. Bryusov V. Sobranie sochineniy v 7 t., t. 7., M., 1975;
6. Burkkhardt Ya. Kul'tura Italii v epokhu Vozrozhdeniya. M., 1996;
7. Dvorzhak M. Istoriya iskusstva kak istoriya dukha. SPb., 2001;
8. Zavadskaya E. Kul'tura Vostoka v sovremennom mire. M., 1977;
9. Zedl'mayr Kh. Utrata serediny. M., 2008;
10. Iskusstvo v situatsii smeny tsiklov. Mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya khudozhestvennoy kul'tury v perekhodnykh protsessakh.(Otvetstvennyy redaktor N. A. Khrenov)., M., 2002;
11. Kozer L. O Pitirime Sorokine // Sorokin P. Krizis nashego vremeni. M., 2009;
12. Konrad N. Polibiy i Syma Tsyan' // Konrad N. Zapad i Vostok. M., 1972;
13. Kessidi F. Ot mifa k logosu. M., 1972;
14. Leont'ev K. Vizantizm i slavyanstvo // Vostok, Rossiya i slavyanstvo., t. 1., M., 1885;
15. Merton R. Sotsial'naya teoriya i sotsial'naya struktura. M., 2006;
16. Muratov P. Drevnerusskaya zhivopis'. Istoriya otkrytiya i issledovaniya. M., 2005;
17. Nitsshe F. Sochineniya. V 2-kh t., t. 1., M., 1990;
18. Osipov G. Tri vstrechi s P. Sorokinym // Sorokin P. Krizis nashego vremeni. M., 2009;
19. Perekhodnye protsessy v russkoy khudozhestvennoy kul'ture. Novoe i Noveyshee vremya (Otvetstvennyy redaktor N. A. Khrenov),M., 2003;
20. Palomnichestvo Germana Gesse v stranu Vostoka // Vostok-Zapad. Issledovaniya, Perevody. publikatsii.M., 1982;
21. Panofskiy E. Idea. K istorii ponyatiya v teoriyakh iskusstva ot antichnosti do klassitsizma. SPb., 1999;
22. Sorokin P. Sistema sotsiologii. V 2-kh t., M., 1993;
23. Sorokin P. Sotsiologicheskie teorii sovremennosti. M., 1992;
24. Sorokin P. Sotsial'naya i kul'turnaya dinamika. Issledovanie izmeneniy v bol'shikh sistemakh iskusstva, istiny, etiki, prava i obshchestvennykh otnosheniy. SPb., 2000;
25. Sorokin P. Krizis nashego vremeni. M., 2009;
26. Sorokin P. Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiya. Obshchestvo. M., 1992;
27. Sorokin P. Obzor tsiklicheskikh kontseptsiy sotsial'no-istoricheskogo protsessa // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 1998., ¹ 11;
28. Sorokin P. Sotsial'naya dinamika i evolyutsionizm // Amerikanskaya sotsiologicheskaya mysl'. M., 1994;
29. Florenskiy P.Sochineniya. V 4-kh t., t. 1., M., 1994;
30. Kheyzinga Y. Teni zavtrashnego dnya. Chelovek i kul'tura. Zatemnennyy mir. SPb., 2010;
31. Khrenov N. Izbrannye raboty po kul'turologii. Kul'tura i imperiya. M., 2014;
32. Tsiklicheskie ritmy v istorii, kul'ture, iskusstve (Otvetstvennyy redaktor N. A. Khrenov)., M., 2004;
33. Yaspers K. Nitsshe. Vvedenie v ponimanie ego filosofstvovaniya. SPb., 2004;
34. Shpengler O. Zakat Evropy. Ocherki morfologii mirovoy istorii. M., 1993;
35. Shelling F. Vvedenie v filosofiyu mifologii. V 2-kh t., SPb., 2013;
36. Shubart V. Evropa i dusha Vostoka. M., 199
37. A. V. Makeenkova Fenomeny «klassicheskogo» i «sovremennogo»
38. v istorii izobrazitel'nogo iskusstva // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2013. - 2. - C. 215 - 227. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.02.10.
39. V. V. Vanslov Kul'tura i iskusstvo v sovremennom mire // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2012. - 3. - C. 99 - 103.