
	Culture and Art Reference: Smirnov, S. A. The Conception of Creative Work in Martin Heidegger’s and Pavel Florensky’s Works (Philosophic Introduction to Poetic Anthropology) // Culture and Art. 2014. № 3. P. 336-348. URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=65255 Smirnov, S. A. The Conception of Creative Work in Martin Heidegger’s and Pavel Florensky’s Works (Philosophic Introduction to Poetic Anthropology) Abstract: The researcher analyzes the concepts of creative work in Martin Heidegger’s and Pavel Florensky’s works. S. Smirnov shows that these two philosophers had rather close views on ontology. Martin Heidegger understood the process of art creation as the idea of a man withdrawing himself from what was ontologically hidden to the light of being. Creative work was associated with ontology and the loss of roots and contact with ontology could turn art into the process of simple form creation and techno into a plain posture. A man himself becomes a living bearer of a particular form of a world, a ‘sign’ and an ‘indicator’ of such a world of creation. Florensky based his idea of man’s creative work or ‘non-organic physicality’ on his concept of ‘organ projection’. Both philosophers viewed creative work as a concept referring to such concepts as organ projection, Techne and human existence and therefore intertwined art with ontology. The researcher carries out the ontological analysis of the basic concepts in Martin Heidegger’s and Pavel Florensky’s works and describes the idea of creative work based on ontological grounds of the aforesaid concepts based on such terms as Techne, posture, the hidden, the non-hidden, creative work, organ projection and energy body. The researcher also offers a description of the genesis of a piece of work that is beyond the scope of esthetics or art studies. The problem of creative work is posed as an ontological problem or a problem of non-classical anthropology when a man himself becomes the organ of being and forms his own energy body and becomes a creative work himself leaving his trace in tools, texts and artifacts. Therefore, based on classical works, the author offers a non-classical vision of the genesis of creative work. Keywords: Creative work, hidden, non-hidden, Techne, technology, energy body, personality, human, anthropology, poetic anthropology. This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article References 1. Veisman A.D. Grechesko-russkii slovar'. Reprint V-go izdaniya 1899 g. – M.: Greko-latinskii kabinet Yu.A.Shichalina, 1991. 2. Vygotskii L.S. Problema soznaniya. // Vygotskii L.S. Sobranie sochine-nii: V 6-ti t. – T. 1. – M.: Pedagogika, 1982. – S. 156 – 167. 3. Vygotskii L.S. Problema razvitiya v strukturnoi psikhologii. // Vygot-skii L.S. Sobranie sochinenii: V 6-ti t. – T. 1. – M.: Pedagogika, 1982. – S. 238 – 290. 4. Dvoretskii I.Kh. Latinsko-russkii slovar'. – M.: Russkii yazyk, 1976. – 1096 s. 5. Zinchenko V.P. Ot klassicheskoi k organicheskoi psikhologii. – M., 1996. – 80 c. 6. Zinchenko V.P. Gipoteza o proiskhozhdenii ucheniya A.A.Ukhtomskogo o do-minante. // Chelovek. – 2000. – № 3. – S. 5-20. 7. Platon Sobranie sochinenii v 4 t. – T. 2 / Obshch. red. A.F.Loseva, V.F.Asmusa, A.A.Takho-Godi; Primech. A.F.Loseva i A.A.Takho-Godi; Per. s drevne-grech. – M.: Mysl', 1993. – 528 s. 8. Smirnov S.A. Kul'turnyi vozrast cheloveka. Filosofskoe vvedenie v psikhologiyu razvitiya. – Novosibirsk: Ofset, 2001. – 161s. 9. Smirnov S.A. Avtopoezis cheloveka. Filosofskie ocherki po antropolo-gii stikha. – Novosibirsk: Ofset, 2011. – 389 c. 10. Smirnov S.A. Novye identichnosti cheloveka: analiz i prognoz antropo-logicheskikh trendov. Antropologicheskii forsait. // Vestnik NGUEU. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 216-241. 11. Smirnov S.A. Vvedenie v antropopoetiku. Opyt neklassicheskogo antro-pologicheskogo diskursa. // Chelovek. – 2013. – № 6. – S.5-17. 12. Smirnov S.A. Struktura akta avtopoezisa. Opyt poeticheskoi antropolo-gii. // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. 2014. № 2. – S. 171-182. 13. Ukhtomskii A.A. Izbrannye trudy. – L.: Nauka, 1978. 14. Florenskii P.A. Stolp i utverzhdenie istiny. – M.: Izd-vo «Pravda», 1990. 15. Florenskii P.A. U vodorazdelov mysli. – M.: Pravda, 1990. – 448 s. 16. Florenskii P.A. U vodorazdelov mysli. // Simvol. – Parizh. – 1992. – №28. – S. 123-216. 17. Fuko M. Germenevtika sub''ekta: Kurs lektsii, prochitannykh v Kollezh de Frans v 1981 – 1982 uchebnom godu / M.Fuko; Per. s fr. A.G.Pogonyailo. – SPb.: Nauka, 2007. – 677 s. 18. Khaidegger M. Razgovor na proselochnoi doroge: Sbornik: Per. s nem. / Pod red. A.L. Dobrokhotova. – M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1991. – 192 s. 19. Khaidegger M. Vremya i bytie: Stat'i i vystupleniya: Per. s nem. – M.: Respublika, 1993. – 447 s. 20. Khaidegger M. Raboty i razmyshleniya raznykh let. Per. s nem. / Sostavl.. perevody, vstup. st., primech. A.V.Mikhailova. – M.: Gnozis, 1993. – 464 s. 21. Khaidegger M. Chto zovetsya myshleniem? / Per. s nem. E.Sagetdinova. Izd. 2-e. – M.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2010. 22. Khoruzhii S.S. K fenomenologii askezy. – M.: Izd-vo gumanitarnoi li-teratury, 1998. – 352 s. 23. Khoruzhii S.S. Ocherki sinergiinoi antropologii. – M.: Institut filo-sofii, teologii i istorii sv. Fomy, 2005. – 408 s. 24. Sheler M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya: Per. s nem. / Per. Denezhkina A.V., Malinkina A.N., Filippova A.F.; Pod red. Denezhkina A.V. – M.: Izd-vo «Gno-zis», 1994. – 490 s. 25. I.V. Egorova Antropologicheskii renessans // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2011. - 8. - C. 18 - 28. 26. V.A. Kutyrev Rekonstruktsiya cheloveka // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2010. - 1. - C. 61 - 66. 27. S. V. Chernov O tvorcheskom naznachenii cheloveka. // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2011. - 1. - C. 41 - 49.

Journals

Books

Smirnov, S. A. The Conception of Creative Work in Martin Heidegger’s and Pavel Florensky’s Works (Philosophic Introduction to Poetic Anthropology)