Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

International Law and International Organizations
Reference:

Shinkaretskaya, G.G. The International Criminal Court: an evaluation attempt

Abstract: The article is devoted to the activities of the International Criminal Courts, some aspects of its activities, judicial proceedings and efficiency. The author considers that currently the ICC is a large and influential judicial body, and it has a range of unique features. One of such features is presence of a Prosecutor, and such a position is not present in any other international court. The Prosecutor implements the legal framework of the Roman Statute as well as The Rules of Procedure and Evidence in order to guarantee the most efficient development of the investigation and judicial proceedings of the ICC cases, as well as to other working methods. The immediate task of the Prosecutor is to guarantee justice and efficiency throughout the spheres of work of the ICC. The ICC probably would not be capable of working without the Prosecutor and his Office. The author pays attention to a defect influencing the efficiency of the ICC activities concerning hardships in collection of evidence and investigation on mass crimes.

Keywords:

international law, international court, the UN, efficiency, judicial proceedings, history, Prosecutor, judicial decision, precedent, process.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Shabas U. Mezhdunarodnyi ugolovnyi sud: istoricheskii shag v dele bor'by s beznakazannost'yu// Moskovskii zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava.-1999.-¹ 4;
2. Lukashuk I.I. Mezhdunarodnyi ugolovnyi sud // Rossiiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. 1999. ¹ 2;
3. Blishchenko I.P. , Fisenko I.V. Mezhdunarodnyi ugolovnyi sud. M., 1998;
4. Zemlyanskaya V.V. Aktual'nye voprosy mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva Mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo suda//Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravosudie. S.418.
5. Cassese A. , Gaeta P. , Jones J. (eds) The Rome Statute of the ICC, Oxford, 2002.
6. Sadat L. N. , The International Criminal Court and the Transformation of International Law: Justice for the New Millennium . NY, 2002;
7. Danner A.M. Enhancing the Legitimacy and Accountability of Prosecutorial Discretion at the International Criminal Court// AJIL, v.97, 2003, p. 510.
8. Benzing M. The Complementarity Regime of the International Criminal Court: International Criminal Justice between State Sovereignty and the Fight against Impunity//Max Planck United Nations Yearbook, v.7, 2003, p. 631.
9. Podshibyakin A.S. Mezhdunarodnyi ugolovnyi sud i problemy natsional'nogo zakonodatel'stva // Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yustitsiya. 2008. ¹ 1.
10. R.A. Kalamkaryan, Yu.I. Migachev. Vseobshchaya Deklaratsiya prav cheloveka: rol' i znachenie v usloviyakh miroporyadka na osnove gospodstva prava Rule of Law. // Pravo i politika. – 2008. – ¹ 12. – S. 104-107.
11. R.A. Kalamkaryan. Vseobshchaya deklaratsiya prav cheloveka-60 let. Pozitiv mezhdunarodno-pravovogo opyta. // Pravo i politika. – 2008. – ¹ 11.
12. G.G. Shinkaretskaya. Iz''yatie iz kompetentsii sudebnykh uchrezhdenii del, otnosyashchikhsya k vnutrennei kompetentsii gosudarstva // Pravo i politika. – 2010. – ¹ 3.
13. G.G. Shinkaretskaya. Zapret zloupotrebleniya mezhdunarodnoi sudebnoi protseduroi kak faktor obespecheniya sudebnogo protsessa // Pravo i politika. – 2010. – ¹ 2.
14. Kalamkaryan R.A. Rol' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele podderzhaniya mezhdunarodnogo pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 1.-S.184-214. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.690. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_690.html
15. Kalamkaryan R.A. Vklyuchennost' Rossiiskoi Federatsii v deyatel'nost' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele obespecheniya mezhdunarodnoi zakonnosti i pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 2.-S.85-118. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.2.691. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_691.html
16. Solov'eva T.V. Ob otsutstvii edinogo normativno zakreplennogo poryadka privedeniya v ispolnenie postanovlenii Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka. // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 4.-S.184-200. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.4.2507. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_2507.html
17. A. S. Smbatyan. Obychnye normy mezhdunarodnogo prava i obshchie printsipy kak istochnik sudebnogo pravotvorchestva // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107.
18. A. S. Smbatyan. Pravotvorchestvo mezhdunarodnykh ugolovnykh tribunalov: opyt MUTBYu // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – ¹ 3. – S. 104-107.
19. U.A. Latypov. Mezhdunarodnoe sotrudnichestvo v sfere ugolovnoi yustitsii: istoriya stanovleniya i sovremennoe sostoyanie // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2009. – ¹ 11.
20. A.S. Smbatyan. Organy mezhdunarodnogo pravosudiya: klassifikatsiya v ramkakh obshchei sistemy // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.04.12.
21. A. S. Smbatyan. Nuzhno li «spasat'» sistemu mezhdunarodnogo sudoproizvodstva ot fragmentatsii? // Pravo i politika. – 2011. – ¹ 9. – S. 104-107
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.