|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
International Law and International Organizations
Reference:
Gurbanov, R.A.
Interaction of the judicial bodies of the EU member states with the judicial bodies
of the EU
// International Law and International Organizations.
2011. ¹ 3.
P. 128-143.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=58566
Gurbanov, R.A. Interaction of the judicial bodies of the EU member states with the judicial bodies of the EUAbstract: This article treats the question of cooperation between judicial bodies of EU member States and judicial bodies of European Union. The author considers that a preliminary ruling is a mechanism of direct and intense cooperation between the courts of a European Union member States and EU Court of justice. The author also points out the indirect ways of cooperation between these judicial bodies, which is accomplished by infl uence of a case law of Court of Justice of the European Union on judicial bodies of EU Member States. Keywords: European Union, Court of Justice of the European Union, judicial bodies of EU Member States, preliminary ruling, case law, case, European law, direct cooperation, indirect cooperation
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format by registered users. Click this link to register or login.
References
1. Alekseevskaya, E.I. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy proizvodstva v sude nadzornoy in-
2. stantsii// Diss. na soiskanie uch. step. k.yu.n. Moskva. 2008. 3. A. Arndt, Selbständigkeit des Bundesverfassungsgericht, NJW, 1965. 4. E. Benda, E. Klein, Verfassungsprozessrecht, Mueller Verl., 2e éd. 2001. 5. R. Fleury, Verfassungsprozessrecht, Luchterhand, 6e éd., 2004,. 6. J. Gerkrath, L’emergence d’un droit constitutionnel pour l’Europe: Modes de formation et sources d’inspiration 7. de la constitution des Communautes et de l’Union europeenne (Etudes europeennes), Editions 8. de l’Universite de Bruxelles, 1997. 9. F. Jacobs, The Role of National Courts and the European Court in Ensuring the Uniform Application of 10. Community Law: Is a New Approach Needed, in Mél. F. Capotorti, Giuffre, 1999, vol. II. 11. K.P.E. Lasok, T. Millett, Judicial control in the EU. Procedures and principles, Richmond Law and Tax, 12. 2009. 13. R. Lecourt, Le juge national devant le Marché commun, IUHEI, 1970, p. 51 14. F. Lichère, L. Potvin-Solis, A. Raynouard, Le dialogue entre les juges européens et nationaux: incantation 15. ou réalité? Bruylant, 2004. 16. J. Pertek, La pratique du renvoi préjudiciel en droit communautaire, Litec, 2001, n° 324. 17. Ch. Pestalozza, Verfassungsprozessrecht, 3e éd., 1991. 18. H. Schermers, D. Waelbroeck, Judicial Protection in the European Union. N. Y., 2001. 19. K. Schlaich, S. Korioth, Das Bundesverfassungsgericht. Stellung, Verfahren, Entscheidungen, Verlag C. 20. H. Beck, München, 2004 21. J. Ziller et J. Lotarski, Institutions et organes judiciaries, in B. De Witte (éd.), Ten Refl ections on the 22. Constitutional treaty for Europe, EUI 2003, |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
