Library
|
Your profile |
Pedagogy and education
Reference:
Popov E.A. (2015). Social Knowledge and Values of Scientific Work. Pedagogy and education, 2, 187–193. https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=66947
Popov E.A. Social Knowledge and Values of Scientific WorkAbstract: The subject of the research is the relationship between social knowledge and culture of scientific work. In terms of modern socio-humanitarian science, research traditions are a very topical issue reltaed to both intrascientific and would-be scientific tendencies. The former includes a quantitative growth of researches practically in all branches of knowledge which leads to the decrease in the quality and culture of scientific work. The would-be scientific tendencies include the fact that researches are often ordered by the government or other subjects. The main research method used by the author of the article is the problem analysis of the relationship between social knowledge and culture of scientific work, the author also uses the method of comparison. The main conclusions of the research are the following: 1) social knowledge obviously needs to improve the culture of research as a result of a growing number of researches in this sphere; 2) sociology is one of the spheres that 'present' research results based on applied methods, thus sociology should consider the need to follow the standards and norms of scientific work first and utmost. Keywords: social knowledge, cognition, norms, standards, values, sociology, society, culture, methodology, epistemology, problems of sociology
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Lebedev S. A. Sovremennaya nauka: sotsial'nost' i innovatsionnost' // Vestnik Mosk. un-ta. Seriya 7. Filosofiya. 2011. ¹ 1.
2. Gorshkov M. K. Dialog rossiiskoi sotsiologii s obshchestvom i vlast'yu (opyt proshlogo, perspektivy budushchego) // Filosofskie nauki. 2011. ¹ 4. 3. Osipova N. G. Otraslevaya matritsa sovremennoi sotsiologii: krizis divergentsii // Vestnik Mosk. un-ta. Seriya 18. Sotsiologiya i politologiya. 2013. ¹ 2. 4. Andreev A. L. Russkaya mechta: vzglyad sotsiologa // Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny. Al'manakh 2013 / OAO «VTsIOM». M., 2013. 5. Nogaibaeva D. T. Gumanisticheskaya funktsiya sotsiologii v nastoyashchee vremya // Sotsiologiya v sovremennom mire: nauka, obrazovanie, tvorchestvo: sbornik statei. Vyp. 5 / pod red. O.N. Kolesnikovoi, E.A. Popova. Barnaul, 2013. 6. Smirnov I. P. Istoriya mysli – istoriya filosofii: problema differentsiatsii // Filosofskie nauki. 2013. ¹ 4. 7. Kemerov V. E. Gumanitarnoe i sotsial'noe: ot oppozitsii k sintezu // Chelovek. 2011. ¹ 1. 8. Gudkov L. D. Sotsiologiya kul'tury: nauchno-analiticheskii obzor tematicheskogo nomera «Kel'nskogo zhurnala po sotsiologii i sotsial'noi psikhologii» // Kul'turologiya: Daidzhest. M., 2012. ¹ 1 (60). 9. Markova L. A. Na puti k novoi ontologii v filosofii nauki // Voprosy filosofii. 2013. ¹ 11. 10. Fedorov N. F. Supramoralizm, ili vseobshchii sintez (t.e. vseobshchee ob''edinenie) // Fedorov N.F. Sobranie sochinenii: V 4-kh tt. Tom I. M., 1995. 11. Solonin Yu. N. Privitie filosofii (Filosofskie fakul'tety i filosofskaya kul'tura) // Voprosy filosofii. 2011. ¹ 2. 12. Filippov A. K teorii sotsial'nykh sobytii // Logos. 2005. ¹ 5 (50). 13. Maksimov L.V. Reduktsiya soznaniya k poznaniyu kak metodologicheskii printsip kognitivnoi nauki i gumanitarnykh distsiplin // Filosofskaya mysl'. - 2014. - 11. - C. 32 - 71. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2014.11.13778. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_13778.html 14. Yudin A.I. Tsennost' kak metod poznaniya sotsial'noi deistvitel'nosti i ee prakticheskogo preobrazovaniya: G.Rikkert i P.L.Lavrov. // Filosofskaya mysl'. - 2014. - 10. - C. 80 - 103. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2014.10.13606. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_13606.html |