Yakovleva E.O., Luneva K.A., Tarikin V.K. —
Prospects for the use of artificial intelligence in law enforcement
// Police activity. – 2025. – ¹ 2.
– P. 1 - 14.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0692.2025.2.71931
URL: https://en.e-notabene.ru/pdmag/article_71931.html
Read the article
Abstract: The object of the research is the practical application of artificial intelligence. The authors noted that artificial intelligence has rapidly and firmly entered everyday life, forming a new field for interaction with the legal system. The subject of research is the legal acts, as well as a number of statistical indicators provided in official sources of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. The expansion of artificial intelligence capabilities has presented new challenges, in particular to criminal law, posing many tasks that require solutions and comprehensive scientific and legal analysis. One of these tasks, as cited by the authors, includes protecting the rights of citizens from the results of the negative use of artificial intelligence, as well as analyzing the effective possibilities of introducing artificial intelligence into the environment of relationships, systems and mechanisms in the investigation and disclosure of crimes. The main methods of the research conducted by the authors are: legal and dogmatic, structural and functional, analysis and systematization. The novelty of the research is the new areas of AI application that the authors have set as the task of the study. Special attention is paid to a number of issues about responsibility for actions committed by artificial intelligence, about determining the subject of a crime when using it, about the optimality and rational boundaries of its use in the investigation and disclosure of crimes by law enforcement agencies. The main conclusion of the study is the prospect of adapting modern criminal law to the rapid development of artificial intelligence, which depends on the degree of growth of scientific and technological progress in this area and requires a clear definition of potential risks and the development of effective law enforcement practice. These circumstances also point to the need for digitalization of law enforcement activities and the establishment of clear ethical principles in the creation and application of artificial intelligence.
Yakovleva E.O., Tarikin V.K., Lubentseva K.A. —
Features of voluntary renunciation of complicity in a crime
// Police activity. – 2024. – ¹ 5.
– P. 74 - 85.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0692.2024.5.72005
URL: https://en.e-notabene.ru/pdmag/article_72005.html
Read the article
Abstract: In order to carry out the tasks facing the criminal law, norms are provided in advance that have an encouraging character, but at the same time stimulate law-abiding behavior in the form of stopping preparations for committing a criminal act. Such an example is the institution of voluntary refusal to commit a crime and bring it to an end both alone and in complicity. At the same time, this category makes it possible to achieve one of the goals of criminal law – the prevention of crime, however, provided that the voluntary refusal becomes voluntary, timely and final. The subject of the presented research is the criminal law norms governing legal relations related to the voluntary refusal of complicity in a crime. The purpose of the study is to analyze the features of voluntary refusal to participate in a crime.The scientific research work analyzes the concept, signs and criminal law significance of voluntary refusal to commit a crime in complicity. The results show that group crimes, due to their prevalence, require a deeper study and development of theoretical foundations, legislative regulation and practical aspects for the correct legal assessment of such acts. The scope of the results is aimed at developing a separate legal norm devoted to the peculiarities of voluntary refusal. The scientific novelty of the study is expressed in the identification of special patterns and problematic aspects in the field of differentiation of voluntary refusal to commit a crime by the organizer, perpetrators and other accomplices.The conclusions emphasize the need to introduce a separate legal norm that will more effectively regulate the legal aspects of complicity, avoid mistakes in qualifying the voluntary refusal of accomplices from completing the crime, as well as ensure justice when bringing to justice participants in a group crime.