Project Work as a Tool for Cooperation Between Student and Teacher Using the Example of the Project 'Course Development and Creating a Bot in Telegram'

Туласынова Н.Ю., Тронь Т.А.

doi:10.7256/2454-0676.2025.1.72662

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Back to contents

Pedagogy and education

Reference:

Tulasynova, N.U., Tron, T.A. (2025). Project Work as a Tool for Cooperation Between Student and Teacher Using the Example of the Project "Course Development and Creating a Bot in Telegram". Pedagogy and education, 1, 1–15. . https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0676.2025.1.72662

Project Work as a Tool for Cooperation Between Student and Teacher Using the Example of the Project "Course Development and Creating a Bot in Telegram"

Tulasynova Nadezhda Urievna

ORCID: 0000-0002-6740-5534

PhD in Pedagogy

Associate professor of the Department of Foreign Languages for the Humanities, North-Eastern Federal University named after M.K. Ammosov

677000, Russia, RS(I) region, Yakutsk, ul. Belinsky, 58

whityt@mail.ru

Tron' Tatyana Aleksandrovna

ORCID: 0009-0009-6164-3855

Master's student,
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
Northeastern Federal University
named after M.K. Ammosov, Pedagogical Institute,
Department of Digital and Technological Education

38 Uygu str., Yakutsk, RS(Ya) region, 677000, Russia

paratron11@gmail.com

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0676.2025.1.72662

EDN:

BEWADM

Received:

10-12-2024

Published:

18-01-2025

Abstract: The subject of this study is the interaction of scientific and research activities of a student and a teacher. The research activities of students and teachers are a key element of the educational process, contributing to the development of critical thinking, analytical skills, and innovation. The interaction between students and teachers within the framework of scientific research plays an important role in forming professional competencies and a scientific worldview. Analysis of the chatbots is necessary for developing the Telegram messenger-based chatbots and their implementation in a specific chatbot, which is the final product of the Telegram Bot Development Course project. The subject of the study covers both the technical aspects of Telegram bot development and the socio-educational aspects of student-teacher cooperation, which makes it possible to comprehensively assess the effectiveness and significance of such projects in the educational process. The study evaluates the effectiveness of project work as a tool for cooperation, which will identify the advantages and disadvantages of this approach and offer recommendations for its further implementation in the educational process. The Telegram platform has been used to create an educational bot, which opens up new opportunities for interactive and game-based learning, especially during the pandemic and the transition to online education. During the implementation of the project, students acquired skills in creating bots for Telegram, mastered Python programming, and learned how to work with the API. Methodological materials and teaching aids have also been developed, which can be used to teach other students in the future. Project work serves as an effective tool for interaction between students and teachers. It promotes the development of necessary skills and competencies and strengthens cooperation between participants in the educational process.

Keywords:

telegram, project, bot, code, course, python, PyCharm, assistance, cooperation, student

References

1. Adolf, V. A. (2022). Results of the implementation of pedagogical support for the formation of foreign language interaction skills of students of future bachelor-teachers of philologists in the digital educational environment of the university. In V. A. Adolf & I. A. Ozolina (Eds.), Social and Humanitarian Knowledge, 1, 109–116.
2. Bezrukova, E. V. (2021). Application of active teaching methods (for example, mental maps and case technology). In Modern professional education: Experience, problems, prospects: Materials of the VIII International scientific and practical conference (Part 2, pp. 58–62). Rostov-on-Don: Southern University (IUBiP), VVM Publishing House.
3. Dovranov, A. R. (2022). Organization of additional education for students of basic school using the example of studying the Python programming language. Mari State University, Pedagogical Institute, Faculty of General and Vocational Education, Department of General Education Disciplines and Methods of Their Teaching, p. 55. Yoshkar-Ola.
4. Fey, N. V. (2023). Problem-based learning as one of the factors in improving the quality of education. In Shamovskie readings: Collection of articles from the XV International scientific and practical conference (Part 2, pp. 349–352). Moscow: 5 for Knowledge.
5. Gaddis, T. (2021). Starting to program in Python (pp. 36–40). Moscow: BHV-Petersburg.
6. Golubeva, N. N. (2023). Relevance of applying case technology in the teacher's training system. In Science, innovation, education: Topical issues of the 21st century: Collection of articles from the International scientific and practical conference (pp. 172–175). Moscow: Science and Education.
7. Galskova, N. (2004). Modern methods of teaching a foreign language: A manual for teachers. Moscow: ARKTI–Glossa.
8. Khvostov, A. A. (2022). The dynamics of moral consciousness among student youth (2000–2020). Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and Economic Psychology, 7(2), 6–34.
9. Lavrinenko, I. Yu. (2023). Use of GPT chatbots in the process of teaching English in a non-linguistic university: Theoretical aspect. Bulletin of the Siberian Institute of Business and Information Technology, 2, 18–25.
10. Makarova, V. V. (2023). Principles and tools of gaming technologies in higher education. Modern Scientist, 3, 189–194.
11. Mikhailova, I. V., Nevolina, V. V., & Vinokurova, N. V. (2022). Interactive technologies for teaching medical students. In Modern problems of innovative development and implementation of results: Collected articles from the XIII International scientific and practical conference (pp. 7–11). Petrozavodsk: MCNS New Science.
12. Nazarova, E. N. (2022). Application of such interactive technology as educational (scientific) debates in the educational process. In World science: Problems and innovations: Collected articles from the LXIII International scientific and practical conference (pp. 206–208). Penza: MCNS Science and Education.
13. Orshanskaya, E. (2005). Teaching rhetoric in Russia and Great Britain (O. N. Ippolitova, Ed.). Moscow: Flinta: Nauka.
14. Passov, E. (1991). Communicative method of teaching foreign language speaking. Moscow: Education.
15. Pirmatov, A. Z. (2021). Working with the Python programming language in the Android operating system. Bulletin of ZHAGU, 1, 69–74. Jalal-Abad.
16. Rubinstein, M. (1927). Teacher's problem: Scientific publication. Moscow–Leningrad: Moscow Publishing House.
17. Savchenko, M. P. (2023). Application of multi-level tasks in the process of training future sales managers in the context of secondary vocational education. In Economics and modern management: Theory, methodology, practice: Collection of articles from the XVI International scientific and practical conference (pp. 35–39). Penza: Science and Education (IP Gulyaev G. Yu.).
18. Sychev, S. E., Dzhalilov, S. A., & Talibov, A. Kh. (2022). Distance learning in an educational organization: Essence and structure. Scientific Notes of P. F. Lesgaft University, 11(213), 543–548.
19. System for assessing the level of professional activity of a foreign language teacher/responsible. (2002). In T. A. Kazaritskaya (Ed.). Moscow: British Council, MSLU, RGPU.
20. Tikhonova, S. A. (2023). Features of creating an individual educational route. In S. A. Tikhonova, A. V. Tukhbatulina, & K. Prokhorova (Eds.), Career Guidance, 1–1, 73–76.

Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The object of research in the presented article is project activity in the educational process, while the subject is its implementation using the example of a programming course. The relevance of the study is due to the growing popularity of programming education and a very significant decrease in the age of acquaintance with this field, which has been observed recently. From a methodological point of view, the work has a pronounced practical character. The main research method is descriptive pedagogical analysis, aimed at conveying the structure and content of the course under study. The list of references meets the requirements. From a linguistic point of view, the work was partially performed in accordance with the requirements of the scientific style. Some phrases have an emotional connotation that is not typical for scientific discourse, for example, ... this is the main tool for working with a bot, thanks to which you can do almost anything. Working with users, automating actions, games, online shopping and much more can be created using this library.... The article may be of interest to a specialized teaching audience. The presented text, with a very high level of informativeness and content, has the character of a methodological development to a greater extent than a scientific article, which will be reflected in the comments below. Scientific novelty cannot consist in evaluating the effectiveness of work results – this is a mandatory requirement for any meaningful research. From the point of view of scientific novelty, it is minimal, but not sufficient. In the authors' review, it is absolutely not necessary to duplicate the Russian and English spelling of the very simple surname Johnson, it is not clear why the surname of Vygotsky, a Domestic scientist, should be written in English, exactly the same can be said about duplicating the international term "constructivism" in Cyrillic and Latin. From a meaningful point of view, a pedagogical scientific article with a similar title is expected to consider the general provisions of the project work and their refraction in the context of programming teaching methods. For example, how does project work within this discipline differ from other pedagogical projects. The claimed interaction between the teacher and the student is revealed very indirectly on an extensive level, but not on an analytical one. The quotation mark is probably misplaced in the title, most likely it would be more correct ... using the example of the course development project "Creating a bot in telegram". In general, the more concise title "Project work within the framework of the course "Creating a bot in telegram", in our opinion, would better reflect the content of the article. In conclusion, the relevance of the research is actually emphasized, but its main theses and formed understandings of what is expected in a scientific article are not listed. The submitted manuscript is made on a relevant topic, has a very high level of content and can be published in a peer-reviewed journal if its policy involves the publication of texts of a methodological nature, while it is desirable to make textual adjustments in accordance with the above comments.

Journals

Books

Project Work as a Tool for Cooperation Between Student and Teacher Using the Example of the Project "Course Development and Creating a Bot in Telegram"