Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Legal Studies
Reference:

Integrity of the new System of scientific Attestation (on the example of academic degree attributes)

Egorov Sergey

ORCID: 0000-0001-8512-400X

Doctor of Laws (LLD) Vice-Rector for Research, Moscow Tax Institute

123308, Russia, Moscow, 3rd Khoroshevskaya street, 2

sergeyyuegorov@gmail.com
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7136.2023.4.38621

EDN:

WBVIPX

Received:

15-08-2022


Published:

04-05-2023


Abstract: The article is devoted to the consideration of the issue of regulatory and legal mechanisms for ensuring the integrity of the Russian system of scientific certification. Due to the growing variety of forms and rules of dissertation defense in dissertation councils of various organizations, the question of whether the modern system is capable of providing equal rights and opportunities for all applicants for academic degrees becomes relevant. To find answers to this question, the study identified three subsystems formed by dissertation councils under the direct supervision of the Higher Attestation Commission, leading educational and scientific organizations, as well as spiritual educational organizations. In order to consider the specifics of each of the groups, a comparative analysis of regulatory and legal acts regulating the awarding of academic degrees and their subsequent use was carried out. The conducted study revealed that with visible integrity, the overall certification system is quite heterogeneous. Firstly, academic degrees in various subsystems have different naming options, which creates a problem of their comparison. Secondly, with the same name, the conditions for awarding may differ significantly, which leads to inequality of applicants. Thirdly, if the conditions of certification are equal, holders of academic degrees receive rights and opportunities in different amounts. The identified problematic aspects require clarification at the level of federal legislation.


Keywords:

academic degrees, scientific certification, dissertation council, state policy, higher education, dissertation, scientific report, theological degrees, Doctor of Philosophy, PhD

This article is automatically translated.

In the context of the growing diversity of rules and practices in the modern system of scientific certification, many problematic issues arise, the key of which is the integrity of the entire system [2]. Is it able to fully ensure equality of rights and opportunities for applicants applying for academic degrees? What can those who successfully pass the dissertation defense in this or that dissertation council count on? At the level of laws and declarations, all are guaranteed comparable conditions, regardless of which part of the certification system they undergo the appropriate procedures [58]. Nevertheless, the actual fulfillment of such obligations raises a number of doubts and concerns among representatives of the professional community [4]. One of the most noticeable indicators of this problematic situation can be the attributes of academic degrees awarded by various educational and scientific organizations [38]. The study of what changes have occurred in this direction after the elimination of the monopoly of the Higher Attestation Commission (HAC) [13] makes it possible to understand whether the specified system continues to maintain its integrity and provide equal rights to all applicants.

In professional discussions related to the issues under consideration, first of all, attention should be paid to the works of Venediktov A.A. [5], Denisova-Schmidt E. [9], Zbrovsky G.E. [16], Matskevich I.M. [22], Molotkova N.V. [23] and other researchers actively engaged in studying the peculiarities of state regulation of educational and scientific activities. Equally important are the arguments of Bridges-Rhodes S. [34], Denicolo P. [30], Kobzar E.N. [31], Trank K. [33], Shin J.K. [32] and other specialists generalizing and comparing Russian and world experience in the field of awarding academic degrees. Such authors as Badmaeva S.V. [1], Markin V.V. [20], Safiullin R.G. [27], Glazunova I.V. [7], Makhmutov A.H. [21] together with colleagues analyze the factors influencing the provision of equal rights and opportunities in education and science. All this provides a sufficient theoretical basis for understanding the current realities of the Russian certification system. The use of a systematic approach, typing, modeling, formal legal method and other applied tools will allow us to rely on existing achievements and advance in the search for answers to the main problem question of this study.

Sources on the topic can be divided into three main groups, the first of which is represented by Russian legislation in the field of state scientific, technical and educational policy, as well as acts of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia and the Higher Attestation Commission [38]. The second group should include local regulations and materials of dissertation defenses in educational and scientific organizations that have received the right to independently award academic degrees. It is assumed that from the moment of approval, the list of such organizations can be regularly updated [50]. The third group consists of acts and other official documents of spiritual educational organizations, which are granted the right to carry out all procedures related to theological degrees [59]. The double subordination of such organizations to the laws on education and on freedom of conscience gives them the opportunity to conduct protection in accordance with their internal regulations. At the same time, the state, when conducting licensing procedures for organizations [52] and accreditation of educational programs [53], takes into account such theological degrees on an equal basis with other academic degrees. The designated theoretical and source base provide the present research with all the resources necessary to find answers to a key research question.

 

 

1. Modern names of Russian academic degreesFor many years, the problem of naming academic degrees has remained quite controversial.

 

Discussions on the abolition of the two-stage model of scientific certification [25], on the introduction of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) [17], on the allocation of professional doctorates [18] and other related topics have repeatedly begun on various platforms. As a result, the center of the Russian certification system still retains two main stages - Candidate of Sciences and Doctor of Sciences. Other variants in different status are present as an experiment or in other forms in different parts of the educational space. A number of universities, for example, Skoltech, award PhD both independently and together with foreign partners [28]. DBA and other professional doctorates have been introduced at the Financial University, HSE, RANEPA and other educational organizations [19]. At the same time, neither the first nor the second claim to state recognition of such documents in the status of academic degrees. Most often they are issued in the form of diplomas of additional professional education. What is the situation with the name in the recognized subsystems within the official system?

Within the framework of dissertation councils directly controlled by the Higher Attestation Commission and the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia, there are only two degrees mentioned above. They are awarded according to scientific specialties and branches of science included in the state nomenclature [54]. An applicant who has successfully defended his dissertation can become a candidate of biological sciences, a doctor of political sciences, a candidate of cultural studies, a doctor of architecture, etc. [55]. Within this subsystem, there is a division into two segments, represented by ordinary and special dissertations, the latter of which consider dissertations containing state secrets [54]. The main number of such associations relates to the military industry due to its specifics. For their control, special expert councils are created in the Higher Attestation Commission from among specialists with the necessary permits [8]. It is worth noting that such structures can award degrees not only in military sciences, but also in other industries. Because of this, a situation arises in which, for example, to obtain a Doctor of technical sciences degree in a special council, instead of publications in peer-reviewed publications, reports on research activities can be provided [51], which causes inequality in the conditions of certification.

Organizations that independently award academic degrees also maintain a two-stage certification model. At the level of public presentations, it was announced the introduction of candidates of sciences of UrFU [47], doctors of sciences of St. Petersburg State University [41] and other analogues, however, in local regulations and issued diplomas, the addition of the name of the university to the academic degree was not widely used [10]. A more interesting situation is observed at the Higher School of Economics, where dissertation councils have the right to award academic degrees not in individual scientific specialties, but immediately in the fields of sciences. A number of experts express critical comments about this [3], which does not stop the practice itself. After defending a dissertation, an applicant can become both a classical doctor of historical sciences or a candidate of philological sciences, as well as a candidate of sciences in education or a doctor of sciences in management. The list of non-standard areas includes state and municipal administration, engineering sciences and applied mathematics, communications and media, as well as other areas [37]. At the same time, all HSE diplomas have the status of state diplomas, which are part of the Russian system of scientific certification.

In the ROC, the degree of Candidate of theology was introduced at the first stage, at the second – Doctor of theology and Doctor of Church history. The differences in names are related to the subject of dissertations defended for a theological degree [49]. In Muslim universities, there is a one-stage model involving the award of the degree of Doctor of Islamic Sciences. A similar practice exists, for example, at Dagestan Islamic University (DIU) [48]. In Protestant education, in particular at the Higher School of Theology (HSE), scientific certification is focused on the practice of the world's leading universities and the norms of the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) [15]. In this regard, professional and academic degrees are allocated at the first stage, and higher theological degrees are allocated at the second. The professional ones include a doctor of ministry and a doctor of practical theology, and the academic ones include a doctor of theology, while all three options correspond to the academic degree of a candidate of sciences. The highest degree is a Doctor of Sciences in theology, equivalent to similar academic degrees [44]. It is important to clarify that the Federal State Educational Standards (FGOS) explicitly state that theological degrees are equivalent to other academic degrees [13].

Summarizing the above, it can be noted that two academic degrees prevail in Russia – Candidate of Sciences and Doctor of Sciences [54]. Most of them have the same appearance, with the exception of those awarded by individual organizations with special rights. So, for example, it is possible to obtain a candidate's degree or a doctor of military sciences only in specialized universities and academies [14]. In a number of branches of science, you can apply for similar degrees, for example, for a candidate of pedagogical sciences in the dissertation councils of the Higher Attestation Commission or a candidate of sciences in education in the dissertation councils of the Higher School of Economics [37]. In many spiritual educational organizations, the word "candidate" has been replaced with "doctor", regardless of whether the two-stage model is preserved [44]. Despite the fact that this situation is somewhat atypical for the previous Russian realities, it is quite normal for global education. For example, the identity of the degrees of PhD and Doctor of Theology (ThD), as well as Doctor of Education (EdD), has been preserved at Harvard for many years. In many universities, a PhD in Law can be equivalent to a PhD in Legal Studies [26].

 

 

2. Development of the nomenclature of scientific specialtiesThe full name of the academic degree includes an indication of the scientific specialty and branch of science, which are fixed in the corresponding list [54].

 

As already noted, not all educational and scientific organizations included in the general certification system equally use the state nomenclature approved by the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia [55]. In the context of preserving the integrity of this system, it is important to analyze in more detail the current situation and the practices developed in its context. In addition, the evolution of the document itself, which has undergone a number of changes in recent years, is of interest [6]. In different periods, the number of specialties included in it decreased and increased due to the enlargement of the corresponding groups and the introduction of new directions [13]. For example, in the edition of 2021, groups such as biotechnology, computer science and informatics, cognitive sciences, subsurface use and mining sciences appeared [24]. A consistent review of each of the formed subsystems will allow you to get a complete picture of what is happening. This can be useful in itself, as well as for finding answers to the key question of this study.

In the first subsystem, all educational and scientific organizations, on the basis of which dissertation councils were created, apply the universal nomenclature in their practice [54]. The scientific specialties existing within it and their groups change from time to time, but the list of industries remains virtually unchanged for many years. Of particular interest in this regard is the military industry, which is an exception to the rule in many legal aspects. In the XX century, the group of specialties "20.00.00 Military Sciences" was directly included in the general nomenclature along with all other areas and was accompanied by a fairly extensive classification [56]. In subsequent years, both the group and the branch of science ceased to be present in new editions of this document, including the 2021 version [55]. Nevertheless, the actual existence of this direction is confirmed by at least two circumstances. Firstly, on the websites of military educational organizations there is still information about the activities of diss councils on military sciences [36]. Secondly, the lists of recommended peer-reviewed scientific publications of the Higher Attestation Commission invariably contain journals specializing in the branch "20.00.00 Military Sciences" [42].

The vast majority of participants in the second subsystem apply the specified nomenclature in their practice without any changes. As already noted, a different approach is the basic one at the HSE – the introduction of proper names, only some of which repeat the commonly used ones [55]. Basically, their formulations correspond to the headings of the areas of professional training. For example, "international relations" exists both in the Federal State Educational Standard and in the name of the HSE Dissertation Council [37]. Each such council develops its own passport of the field of science, which actually replaces the passport of the scientific specialty [43]. Some intersections with the general nomenclature can be traced at another level. If you want to defend a dissertation on the problems of computer science, the applicant can choose one of two options. In the HAC subsystem, this direction corresponds to the degrees of Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences and Candidate of Technical Sciences [46]. The second option makes it possible to obtain a PhD in computer science at the HSE [39]. The actual similarities in both cases are quite significant, however, at the level of specification for subsequent use for work purposes, the second option seems to be more advantageous.

In the spiritual educational organizations of the Russian Orthodox Church , theological degrees are awarded in two specialties: "theology" and "church history", and according to the latter of them only at the second stage of scientific certification [49]. Muslims, including in the DIU, have created a branch of "Islamic Sciences", which includes such specialties as: "Quran and Quranic Sciences", "Hadith and Hadith sciences", "Islamic Law", "Fundamentals of Islamic Law", "Islamic Belief", "Tasawwuf", "History of Islam", "The Life of the Prophet Muhammad", "Islamic Ethics (ahlyak)", "The Call in Islam" [48]. In the Protestant High School, scientific certification is carried out in accordance with the nomenclature independently approved by this spiritual educational organization [44]. A common branch of science is "Theology", within which various specialties are distinguished. Their list is focused on the standards of the Euro-Asian Accreditation Association (EAA), in which the following areas of theology are present: "Biblical Studies", "Historical Theology", "Systematic Theology", "Practical Theology". Within each of these areas, there are scientific specialties that clarify their content [11]. The EAA classification itself is a continuation of the specialization "0221 Religion and theology" within ISCED [15].

As the comparative analysis on the issue of the names of scientific specialties shows, there is no complete unity in this direction within the Russian certification system. The nomenclature approved by the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia remains the most significant, but in fact is not all-encompassing [6]. Firstly, there are no separate industries in its public version. Secondly, some educational organizations award academic degrees in scientific specialties that are outside the general list [37]. Thirdly, during the existence of the system, many degrees were awarded in those specialties that are currently no longer present in the nomenclature [56]. Nevertheless, the actors of the system under consideration in all subsystems are making efforts to ensure integrity and mutual recognition within the framework of the Russian scientific certification. The Higher Attestation Commission and the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia regularly collect and consolidate information on the activities of organizations that have received the right to independently award academic degrees [38]. Spiritual educational organizations in their official documents orient norms and procedures to current legal realities [11]. The creation of a new approach to taking into account the ever-growing diversity of directions could improve the situation.

 

 

3. International use of academic degreesThe academic degrees awarded in Russia are primarily focused on internal tasks.

 

Scientific certification is part of the state policy in the field of scientific and technical development and improvement of education [58]. At the same time, however, opportunities for the international application of relevant documents also exist and have been expanding for many years [4]. Most of the options are provided by international treaties, thanks to which Russian diplomas of various levels are automatically recognized in many states [40]. In the situation of the monopoly of the Higher Attestation Commission, this practice was relatively simple and transparent, but in the context of the growing diversity of actors, it looks somewhat more complicated [3]. In fact, the available options for using the certification results outside the Russian Federation differ in different subsystems, so it is worth checking whether they provide a guaranteed minimum [2]. Academic and professional rights and opportunities that applicants receive who are defending their dissertations within the framework of certain dissertation councils depend on this. The main interest is the regulatory regulation of this issue, as well as decisions taken by relevant educational and scientific organizations regarding basic and additional options.

Diplomas issued based on the results of attestation in dissovets under the supervision of the Higher Attestation Commission are executed according to a universal template in Russian [54]. Their appearance changed somewhat over time, but generally retained similar features [57]. If the holders wish to obtain recognition of an academic degree in a foreign country, there are several main ways depending on the international treaties of the Russian Federation. The first of them is full automatic mutual recognition, provided there is a valid bilateral agreement. Such opportunities exist mainly in the CIS countries, but there are similar agreements with non-CIS countries [40]. Here it will be enough to translate your diploma into the appropriate language and notarize the translation. The second way is to affix an apostille on documents in the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia or regional departments. You can take advantage of this chance to work in countries that are parties to the Hague Convention on the Abolition of the Requirements for the Legalization of Foreign Official Documents [35]. For other states, a third way is available – consular legalization, which involves a more complex and lengthy procedure for confirming the relevant documents [58].

In the second subsystem, all the options described above are available to applicants, because the possibility of obtaining them is directly prescribed in the relevant regulatory legal acts [54]. In addition, educational and scientific organizations that independently award academic degrees often try to provide additional opportunities. For example, almost all such diplomas are executed in two languages at once – Russian and English [46]. The following translation options are most common: "Candidate of Sciences" is designated by the words "Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)", and "Doctor of Sciences" – "Doctor of Science (DSc)". Academic degrees from the first subsystem are also translated in a similar way, which corresponds to the wording in international treaties and internal state acts [40]. Against this background, the Lomonosov Moscow State University stands out somewhat, where another language analogue is used at the Doctor of Sciences level – "Doktor habilitatus (Dr.habil.)" [45]. This formulation is more in line with the foreign practice of awarding higher doctoral degrees in states where there is habilitation. For example, in Germany, where there is also a two-stage system of scientific certification, the second stage is designated by the same words [29].

For holders of diplomas of theological degrees, the previously designated legalization options are not available [12], since their status is still in a state of clarification, and there are no direct indications of such a possibility in the relevant regulatory legal acts [38]. As a result, in each specific case, the recognition of such documents in foreign countries can take place according to the most complex procedure without guarantees of its successful passage. Diplomas of the theological degrees of the Russian Orthodox Church are performed only in Russian [49]. Their further application outside of Russia depends on the availability of appropriate confessional structures in a particular state. Islamic spiritual educational organizations issue their diplomas in Russian and Arabic, since the latter is the main language for international communication in this denomination [48]. In the Protestant School of Higher Education, all those who have passed the certification are issued two diplomas at the same time – in Russian and English. "Doctor of Ministry" corresponds to "Doctor of Ministry (DMin)", "Doctor of Practical Theology" – "Doctor of Practical Theology (DPT)", "Doctor of theology" – "Doctor of Theology (ThD)", "Doctor of theology" – "Doctor Habilitatus (Dr.Habil.)" [44].

Based on the results of the comparison, it can be argued that in the first two subsystems, applicants can apply for comparable rights [3]. Holders of theological degrees in this case are limited in their rights, despite the fact that in a number of other matters they receive academic and professional rights on an equal basis with other specialists [11]. Such unevenness significantly violates the integrity of the entire system, which in other aspects demonstrates unity. The issuance of diplomas in two languages greatly simplifies their international use. In many situations, the absence of the need to translate one's academic degree documents accelerates the processes of their recognition in other countries [25]. It is also useful to have interuniversity agreements that introduce direct recognition of the results of scientific certification, regardless of the presence or absence of similar state international agreements [46]. The latter is especially important for spiritual educational organizations, whose rights are limited not only in Russia, but also abroad [15]. In general, despite the differences, different subsystems are guided by similar mechanisms of international recognition of academic degrees.

 

 

ConclusionIn its most general form, the Russian system of scientific attestation still appears to be holistic and capable of providing comparable rights.

 

The most limited in terms of opportunities within its framework is the third subsystem formed by spiritual educational organizations, whose diplomas cannot be apostilled. Otherwise, relative equality is observed in all three subsystems. Everywhere, with the exception of Islamic organizations, there is a two-stage model for awarding academic degrees. The specific names of degrees sometimes differ, but in terms of the academic and professional rights they are quite equivalent. Leading universities strive to issue diplomas not only in Russian, but also in other languages – most often in English. Translated versions of documents simplify the subsequent application of the certification results, since they immediately indicate the level and orientation of a particular training profile, compliance with which was confirmed during the defense of the dissertation in the dissertation council. In addition to purely formal aspects, the possibilities of holders of certain degrees are influenced by the reputation of the educational or scientific organizations that awarded them, the increasing role of which requires a separate study.

References
1. Badmaeva S.V., Novikova E.V., Shubenkova E.V. Modernization of postgraduate studies in the new system of higher education // Bulletin of the Russian University of Economics named after G.V. Plekhanov. 2018. No. 1 (97). pp. 13-22.
2. Bekin A.V., Zbaratsky B.A. Problems of implementation of the principles of publicity and accessibility in the system of attestation of scientific personnel of the Russian Federation // Actual problems of Russian law. 2021. No. 4 (125). Volume 16. S. 11-22.
3. Vasiliev S.A., Zenin S.S. Separate problems of legal support for the implementation of the right to independently award academic degrees by educational and scientific organizations // Bulletin of the public research laboratory "Interaction of the penitentiary system with civil society institutions: historical, legal and theoretical and methodological aspects." 2018. No. 13. S. 53-63.
4. Vasiliev S.A., Zenin S.S. Trends in the development of the state system of scientific certification and problems arising in connection with this // Bulletin of the public research laboratory "Interaction of the penitentiary system with civil society institutions: historical, legal and theoretical and methodological aspects." 2019. No. 15. S. 79-87.
5. Venediktov A.A. The procedure for organizing the work of the Higher Attestation Commission as a tool for improving the certification of scientific personnel // Armament and Economics. 2019. No. 3 (49). pp. 111-113.
6. Gabov A.V., Matskevich I.M. The nomenclature of scientific specialties as an element of the state system of scientific certification: to the formulation of the question // Law enforcement monitoring. 2020. No. 2 (35). pp. 18-28.
7. Glazunova I.V., Shirkin A.A. Organization of the training of scientific personnel in doctoral studies: today's problems // Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2018. No. 5. S. 184-189.
8. Glukhov E.A., Novokshonov D.V. Military doctoral students: problems of legal regulation of admission to doctoral studies and military service in it // Law in the armed forces-military legal review. 2020. No. 6 (275). pp. 75-81.
9. Denisova-Schmidt E. Russian higher education: responses to the challenges of the time in the field of training young scientists and retaining staff // World of Russia. 2021. No. 30 (3). pp. 174-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038X-2021-30-3-174-187.
10. Dyatlov A.V., Kovalev V.V., Vodenko K.V. Independent award of scientific degrees: problems and prospects // Bulletin of the South Russian State Technical University (NPI). Series: Social and economic sciences. 2021. V. 14. No. 5. S. 171-179.
11. Egorov S.Yu. Evangelical theological education in the context of Russian legislation and confessional norms // Politics and Society. 2018. No. 10. S. 78-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0684.2018.10.27517.
12. Egorov S.Yu. Organizational Approaches and Methods for Implementing Tasks for the Training of Ministers and Religious Personnel // Pedagogy and Education. 2020. No. 1. S. 38-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0676.2020.1.27601.
13. Egorov S.Yu. The problem of the integrity of the new Russian system of scientific certification (on the example of requirements for a dissertation) // Modern Education. 2022. No. 1. S. 9-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8736.2022.1.37622.
14. Egorov S.Yu. The work of dissertation councils of the new system of scientific certification // University management: practice and analysis. 2022. No. 26 (1). S.: 82-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2022.01.006.
15. Egorov S.Yu. Systems of Evangelical Theological Education in the Context of International Norms and Principles // International Law and International Organizations. 2018. No. 3. S. 47-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0633.2018.3.27515.
16. Zborovsky G.E., Ambarova P.A. The dream of a good education: contradictions in the development of educational communities in Russian universities // World of Russia. 2019. No. 28 (2). pp. 98-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038X-2019-28-2-98-124.
17. Karavaeva E.V., Malandin V.V., Mosicheva I.A., Teleshova I.G. Postgraduate Studies as a Level of Higher Education: Status, Problems, Possible Solutions // Higher Education in Russia. 2018. V. 27. No. 11. S. 22-34.
18. Larson J.P.M. Cooperation between universities and enterprises globalization of education in the field of management: a European perspective // ​​University management: practice and analysis. 2018. V. 22. No. 2 (114). pp. 17-24.
19. Manyushis A.Yu. The First Independent University of Russia: systemic innovation for the country and regions (to the 25th anniversary of the International University in Moscow) // Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia. 2017. V. 204. No. 2. S. 478-502.
20. Markin V.V., Voronov V.V., Ilishko D. Innovations in the training of highly qualified scientific personnel: international experience and Russian realities (expert opinion) // Innovation and expertise: scientific papers. 2019. No. 2 (27). pp. 121-135.
21. Makhmutov A.Kh., Kuznetsova A.R. Problems of training highly qualified personnel in the Russian Federation // Economics and management: a scientific and practical journal. 2020. No. 1 (151). pp. 4-9.
22. Matskevich I.M. General and particular issues of attestation of scientific personnel in the system of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia // Legal Science and Practice: Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2019. No. 4 (48). pp. 312-318.
23. Molotkova N.V., Popov A.I. Methodology of certification of scientific and pedagogical personnel of educational institutions // Questions of modern science and practice. University. IN AND. Vernadsky. 2020. No. 1 (75). pp. 157-170.
24. Pakhomov S.I., Gurtov V.A., Stasevich A.V. Introduction of a new nomenclature of scientific specialties in Russia: continuity and innovation // Education and science. 2021. No. 8. Volume 23. S. 11-36.
25. Radaev V.V. Academic degrees of the National Research University Higher School of Economics // Windows of Academic Growth. 2017. No. 15 (146). pp. 2-3.
26. Ruban L.S. Comparative analysis of the Russian and Western systems of education and training of scientific personnel // Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Sociology. 2020. V. 20. No. 2. S. 416-429.
27. Safiullin R.G. Regional aspect of the training of scientific personnel in Russia // Fundamental research. 2020. No. 12. S. 203-208.
28. Untura G.A. Integration of Science and Education in the Universities of the Regions: Multi-channel Financing and Various Models of Organization // Tomsk State University Bulletin. Economy. 2021. No. 54. S. 53-92.
29. Shumakova I.A., Miroshnichenko L.N. The system of scientific attestation in Russia and Germany: comparative characteristics // Bulletin of the Voronezh State University. Series: Problems of Higher Education. 2018. No. 1. S. 148-151.
30. Denicolo, P., Duke, D., Reeves, J. Delivering Inspiring Doctoral Assessment. London: SAGE, 2020.-232 p.
31. Kobzar, E., Roshchin, S. Russian doctoral education // Trends and Issues in Doctoral Education: A Global Perspective. London: Sage, 2020. PP. 127-151.
32. Shin, J.C., Jung, H., Lee, S.J. Professional Socialization of Postdoctoral Training among Academics in South Korea // International Journal of Chinese Education. 2019 Vol. 8(2). PP. 209-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/22125868-12340113.
33. Trank, C.Q., Brink, K. Teaching and Learning in Doctoral Programs: An Introduction to the Themed Section // Journal of Management Education. 2020 Vol. 44(4). PP. 468-472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562920931910.
34. Van Cleave, J., Bridges-Rhoads, S., Hughes, H.E. Work/Think/Play in Doctoral Education // Qualitative Inquiry. 2018 Vol. 24(10). PP. 739-742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418767215.
35. Hague Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalization for Foreign Public Documents, October 5, 1961.
36. Dissertation councils of VU // Military University of the Ministry of Defense of Russia. URL: https://vumo.mil.ru/Nauka/Dissertacionnye-sovety (date of access: 02.08.2022).
37. Dissertation Councils of the National Research University Higher School of Economics // National Research University Higher School of Economics. URL: https://www.hse.ru/org/hse/science/136787/ (date of access: 02.08.2022).
38. Documents // Higher Attestation Commission under the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia. URL: https://vak.minobrnauki.gov.ru/documents (date of access: 02.08.2022).
39. Additional requirements for the structure and design of dissertations and resumes of applicants for academic degrees, submitting documents to the dissertation council in computer science NRU HSE // NRU HSE. ULR: https://www.hse.ru/data/2019/12/02/1522456245/Requirements for the thesis and summary.pdf (date of access: 02.08.2022).
40. International treaties on mutual recognition of education documents // FGBU “Glavexpertcenter”. URL: https://nic.gov.ru/ru/docs/foreign/confirmation (date of access: 02.08.2022).
41. On the procedure for awarding scientific degrees at St. Petersburg State University // St. Petersburg State University. URL: https://spbu.ru/openuniversity/documents/o-poryadke-prisuzhdeniya-uchenyh-stepeney-v-sankt-peterburgskom (date of access: 08/02/2022).
42. The list of peer-reviewed scientific publications in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate of sciences, for the degree of doctor of sciences should be published // Ministry of Education and Science of Russia. URL: http://perechen.vak2.ed.gov.ru/list (date of access: 02.08.2022).
43. Regulations on the Dissertation Council of the National Research University Higher School of Economics // National Research University Higher School of Economics. URL: https://www.hse.ru/docs/214078581.html (date of access: 08/02/2022).
44. Regulations on the awarding of theological degrees (academic degrees) in the Religious Organization-the Spiritual Educational Organization of Higher Education for Christians of the Evangelical Faith (Pentecostals) Higher School of Theology // Higher School of Theology. URL: https://degree.theology.moscow/assets/doctoral-degrees-2019.pdf (accessed 08/02/2022).
45. Regulations on the award of academic degrees at the Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov // Moscow State University. URL: https://www.msu.ru/science/dissert/pol-uchstep.pdf (date of access: 02.08.2022).
46. ​​Regulations on the awarding of academic degrees at the National Research University Higher School of Economics // National Research University Higher School of Economics. URL: https://www.hse.ru/docs/218589582.html (date of access: 08/02/2022).
47. Regulations on the award of academic degrees in UrFU // UrFU. URL: https://dissovet.urfu.ru/fileadmin/user_upload/site_15871/Polozhenie_o_prisuzhdenii_uchenykh_stepenei_v_UrFU__Versija_3_.pdf (date of access: 02.08.2022).
48. Regulations on the council for the defense of dissertations for the theological academic degree of Doctor of Islamic Sciences // DIU. URL: http://diudag.ru/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Regulations-of-the-council site.pdf (date of access: 02.08.2022).
49. Regulations on the All-Church Council for the Defense of Doctoral Dissertations in Theology and Church History // All-Church Doctoral Dissertation Council. URL: http://dissovet.net/images/pdf/regulations_main.pdf (accessed 08/02/2022).
50. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated May 11, 2017 No. 553 “On approval of the Regulations on the formation of a list of scientific organizations and educational organizations of higher education, which are granted the rights provided for in paragraphs two to four of paragraph 3.1 of Article 4 of the Federal Law “On Science and State Scientific and Technical politics."
51. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of March 17, 2015 No. 235 “On the procedure for awarding academic degrees to persons using information constituting state secrets in their work.”
52. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of September 18, 2020 No. 1490 “On Licensing Educational Activities”.
53. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of November 18, 2013 No. 1039 “On state accreditation of educational activities”.
54. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of September 24, 2013 No. 842 "On the procedure for awarding academic degrees."
55. Order of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation dated February 24, 2021 No. 118 “On approval of the nomenclature of scientific specialties in which academic degrees are awarded, and amendments to the Regulations on the Council for the Defense of Dissertations for the Candidate of Science degree, for the academic degree doctor of sciences, approved by order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation dated November 10, 2017 No. 1093.
56. Order of the Ministry of Science of Russia dated February 28, 1995 No. 24 “On the nomenclature of specialties of scientific workers”.
57. Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation of January 14, 2019 No. 1n “On approval of the forms of diplomas of a doctor of science and a candidate of science and technical requirements for them.”
58. Federal Law No. 127-FZ of August 23, 1996 “On Science and State Science and Technology Policy”.
59. Federal Law No. 125-FZ of September 26, 1997 “On Freedom of Conscience and Religious Associations”

Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The object of research in the presented manuscript is the system of scientific certification in the Russian Federation, and the subject is the nomenclature of academic degrees. In the context of the reform of Russian education, this topic is highly relevant and potentially problematic. The study is theoretical in nature, with both review and system analysis elements. Its main tools are the analysis of regulatory sources and the current state of the nomenclature of academic degrees. There is no appeal to opponents as such, however, the review nature of the study in itself does not always imply discussion, so in this case this cannot be considered a disadvantage. The text of the work contains deductive research logic: Thus, from the general regulations for awarding academic degrees in the Russian Federation, the author proceeds to the specific features of their nomenclature and international use and recognition of academic degrees in the context of the characteristics of each subsystem. The advantages of the work include the following. 1) High relevance of the research. 2) The logic of the presentation of the material, a competent language that fully meets the requirements of the scientific style. 3) Highlighting in the text of individual substantive components corresponding to the vector of analysis within the framework of the chosen methodology. 4) An excellent selection of bibliographies with real links to these sources. The classification of sources presented at the beginning of the work deserves attention. Despite the educational theme in the text, legal analysis clearly prevails over pedagogical analysis, which makes the work interesting primarily for a legal audience, including as a possible meaningful source for the theoretical part of the qualification study. It is possible to make the following comments on the text of the manuscript. 1) The research methodology is implicitly outlined, but not indicated in accordance with the general requirements in the form of a separate part or paragraph at the beginning of the work. 2) In the main part of the text, the author's point of view regarding the current nomenclature is almost not traced, which makes the text look more like a fragment of a dissertation than a journal article. 3) The study would benefit if the text of the work identified specific criteria for the integrity of the system under study and specific examples of compliance/non-compliance with these criteria (taking into account the fact that integrity is stated in the title of the work). 4) The study would benefit significantly if the advantages and disadvantages of the current system and nomenclature were reflected in a diagram, table, either a separate list or in any other form other than a solid single paragraph of the conclusion. 5) As a proposal, it says that "the creation of a new approach to taking into account the ever-growing diversity of directions could improve the situation," however, this concludes the main text. It would be more logical to outline at least a possible new approach as a potential counterweight to the current one. These remarks, except for the lack of a detailed description of the methodology, are of a recommendatory nature and do not negate the fact that the text is executed at a good theoretical and scientific level, meets the basic requirements for manuscripts of this kind and can be published in a peer-reviewed publication in the appropriate direction after adding the methodological part.